Randy Carson
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,306
- Location
- Apex, NC
Something I've been wondering about for the past few years...
Does the NCAA Selection committee intentionally cram as many ACC teams into as few Regions as possible to avoid the possibility of an all-ACC final four?
This year, Notre Dame and Duke are in the same bottom half of the west while UNC and VT are in the East. And why is ND (11) NOT in the Midwest? And Loyola-Chicago (11) and Michigan (10) travel to the south while Miami (10) gets sent to the Midwest. Does the committee want to minimize the number of fans who will travel to the games?
Okay...I know that a lower rated team might have to travel, but why not have at least one ACC team in each region? No ACC team is seeded in the South Regional. Um...where is the ACC located primarily?
In years past, when we sent 8-9 teams to the dance, I thought the seeding was WORSE with multiple ACC teams facing each other in early rounds. It was like replaying the ACC tournament but for bigger stakes.
Is it like this for all the Conferences? Or is there some anti-ACC thing at work?
Does the NCAA Selection committee intentionally cram as many ACC teams into as few Regions as possible to avoid the possibility of an all-ACC final four?
This year, Notre Dame and Duke are in the same bottom half of the west while UNC and VT are in the East. And why is ND (11) NOT in the Midwest? And Loyola-Chicago (11) and Michigan (10) travel to the south while Miami (10) gets sent to the Midwest. Does the committee want to minimize the number of fans who will travel to the games?
Okay...I know that a lower rated team might have to travel, but why not have at least one ACC team in each region? No ACC team is seeded in the South Regional. Um...where is the ACC located primarily?
In years past, when we sent 8-9 teams to the dance, I thought the seeding was WORSE with multiple ACC teams facing each other in early rounds. It was like replaying the ACC tournament but for bigger stakes.
Is it like this for all the Conferences? Or is there some anti-ACC thing at work?
Last edited: