- Messages
- 2,856
You mean 5 right?Maybe I'm being unfair but I'm not overly impressed with 52's fits and reads. Nebraska got caught cheating a bit here.
Thx!Been going through all of Tennessee's 2016 football games on youtube while I'm getting thing done around the house and the Appalachian State game is a good one to watch to get an idea of Tennessee dealing with the option and cutblocks. App gave a lot of option looks out of the shotgun in that game.
UT's two offensive playmakers created a lot of hesitation and/or cheating by defenses, you can see it here.
Sometimes bad defense is just bad defense.
We should get a game with NebraskaYea. Lots of poor angles and poor eyes.
Wasn't a rule about WR crack blocks put into effect recently?LEVERAGE - the blame belongs to the CB here - you're the flank, nothing gets outside of you. At least that's the way it appears. If it's man coverage, then I take it back.
My gosh, that UT WR could've killed one of those Neb inside defenders with a crack block.
I don't think so. I think the only rule is that when you block toward the middle (like this would be) you have to stay high (no cut blocks - which isn't when we cut anyway).Wasn't a rule about WR crack blocks put into effect recently?