Spring Game 2017...How will we know if we are good?

[techman]

If our offense excels does that mean our defense is weak? Or if our defense excels is our offense weak? How will we know if we are good or bad?

What should we look for?

 

[Dottie1145]

If our offense excels does that mean our defense is weak? Or if our defense excels is our offense weak? How will we know if we are good or bad?

What should we look for?

Good plays on both sides, and battles on the line .

 

[Eastman]

Both and Neither. I think in spring games you get excited when you see individual talent displayed. But when generalizing to the whole offense or defense we really won't know much until the season get's going.

 

[GTpdm]

The offense not putting the ball on the ground would definitely be a good thing, without any negative connotation to the defense.

 

[stech81]

If CPJ says it was ok we did some things good and some things bad . And no one got hurt.

 

[Ibeeballin]

You won't

 

[AE 87]

I think our O will be good, so if our D stops them, that will be good.

 

[stech81]

You won't

True , but as we know the rest of the summer if the offense looks good we will hear about how bad our defense will be and if the offense looks bad we will hear about that all summer.

 

[33jacket]

Dude. Our D is always weak. And i dont see a change this year. So. We need to hope the O lights it up.

 

[alentrekin]

Could benchmark off of guys whose skills we know -- Dedrick, Parker, Keshun, AJ, Corey, Brad, etc -- but ya we won't really know.

 

[Dottie1145]

Could benchmark off of guys whose skills we know -- Dedrick, Parker, Keshun, AJ, Corey, Brad, etc -- but ya we won't really know.

Brad....Morgan?

 

[Madison Grant]

Well if 2014 is any indication, if we look like total crap, we'll be great.

 

[Skeptic]

I think if we play well against a quality opponent -- Tennessee -- in the first game -- and our quarterbacking looks solid, then we have a good chance of being good. It is waffling for sure, but Tennessee is going to be tougher than some on the board think. Boston College last season we were kind of okay and had to finish with another surge, so. I am trying really hard to look at Tennessee and Tennessee only, but the guys should be able to get up for their next-door neighbor. Don't remind me of Clemson.

 

[GTech63]

Watch the @GeorgiaTechFB Spring Game tonight at 7pm on @ACCNetworkExtra! http://es.pn/2oahES1 I came across this and hope it works for us out of towners.

 

[alentrekin]

Brad....Morgan?

Brad Stewart, WR, Benedictine Military School, topic of much debate on this board.

CPJ made it sound like Ricky wasn't going to play much, so Brad (Stewart) would be a known at wideout.

 

[Madison Grant]

I think if we play well against a quality opponent -- Tennessee -- in the first game -- and our quarterbacking looks solid, then we have a good chance of being good. It is waffling for sure, but Tennessee is going to be tougher than some on the board think. Boston College last season we were kind of okay and had to finish with another surge, so. I am trying really hard to look at Tennessee and Tennessee only, but the guys should be able to get up for their next-door neighbor. Don't remind me of Clemson.

Could be deceiving too. We beat the crap out of Notre Dame one year, and had an okay season. Turned out Notre Dame was a dumpster fire. Tennesee could be the same with Butch on the hot seat.

 

[AE 87]

Brad Stewart, WR, Benedictine Military School, topic of much debate on this board.

CPJ made it sound like Ricky wasn't going to play much, so Brad (Stewart) would be a known at wideout.

@Dottie1145 was joking. Stewart is his boyfriend.

 

[Dottie1145]

@Dottie1145 was joking. Stewart is his boyfriend.

Hahaha good one.

 

[takethepoints]

As the Skeptic says, we'll know (sorta) when we play UT. Most spring games don't tell you very much and this one will probably tell us less then most since so many players are being held out.

I'm going to be watching Nate Cottrell myself and the 2nd OL.

 

[alentrekin]

was all but ok now

maybe we should add "in a relationship with" as a subheader.