If that’s the way it’s looked at, then we should play 3 nobodies and uga every year. Duke played a charmin schedule and doesn’t deserve the gator bowl imoIf. The bowl committee isn't looking at that kind of stuff. We are a 7-5 team and got a 7-5 bowl game.
IIWII
This is pure facts.Disagree. The games are more about money / viewership. Duke doesn’t have a real fanbase and played no one.
VT lost three of their last four to lesser teams. And before you mention that VT beat us without King, we beat Duke full strength.
We got shafted.
Pretty sure conference splits all money evenly.Can someone explain how bowl payouts are distributed. Read one article that said they are paid to the conferences.
Duke has a 9-3 record and I don't see a huge difference in Birmingham vs Dukes Mayo.Disagree. The games are more about money / viewership. Duke doesn’t have a real fanbase and played no one.
VT lost three of their last four to lesser teams. And before you mention that VT beat us without King, we beat Duke full strength.
We got shafted.
Disagree. The games are more about money / viewership. Duke doesn’t have a real fanbase and played no one.
VT lost three of their last four to lesser teams. And before you mention that VT beat us without King, we beat Duke full strength.
We got shafted.
Perhaps we should. Especially in the 12 team playoff world.If that’s the way it’s looked at, then we should play 3 nobodies and uga every year. Duke played a charmin schedule and doesn’t deserve the gator bowl imo
We should have been 8-4 playing a significant portion of schedule with a hobbled starting QB and RBs 1-4 heavily dinged. That ref fiasco in the nutlicker game cost us a really good bowl against a top quality opponent. Yeah we got lucky and got paired with Ou, but they are 6-6, not exactly the Lincoln Riley Ou team of old.The whining is crazy to me. We’re likely to play a quality opponent within driving distance of campus. For a 7-5 team, I’ll take it. Remember the Little Caesar’s Bowl?