Roster Updates - ATL and Captains #USFvsGT

[GTRambler]

For those players inked in boldface throughout all positions, what does that mean?

Sorry I’m still confused, but it’s kind of strange that there’s only one player listed in boldface ink under the Defensive End chart ... when I thought we had two defensive end starters?

 

[GTRambler]

Also kind of baffling is no boldface ink for our punter, Pressley Harvin.

What does he need to do in order for his name to be highlighted in bold?

 

[Sarrick]

For those players inked in boldface throughout all positions, what does that mean?

Sorry I’m still confused, but it’s kind of strange that there’s only one player listed in boldface ink under the Defensive End chart ... when I thought we had two defensive end starters?

Antwon Owens who started at DE last week moved back to DT.

 

[danny daniel]

For those players inked in boldface throughout all positions, what does that mean?

Sorry I’m still confused, but it’s kind of strange that there’s only one player listed in boldface ink under the Defensive End chart ... when I thought we had two defensive end starters?

Maybe Owen started at DE last week and he is slated to play DT this week?

 

[augustabuzz]

I don't care about MPH's, I need it translated to forty times.

This staff is jacking everything up.

It's measured the same as the NFL. That time would be top 5 in NFL.

 

[alentrekin]

The word on the street is that they aren’t the same thing. Will see moving forward.

I think a lot of the Defensive guys will remain the same but expect a different look at QB and some of the backs/receivers to start against USF.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Curious what you mean by backs/receivers? Different package to start, or different starters? I assume Davis, Mason, Brown, Carter and Camp are still leading their groups, but idk anything.

 

[MidtownJacket]

Curious what you mean by backs/receivers? Different package to start, or different starters? I assume Davis, Mason, Brown, Carter and Camp are still leading their groups, but idk anything.

Yeah I am predicting we come out with Lucas ready to go to the air. Which would likely have a different personnel grouping. It’s all just a guess though, I don’t have any inside track info.

I just don’t understand the rationale for only giving him that one series last week unless we were saving him for something else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[alentrekin]

Yeah I am predicting we come out with Lucas ready to go to the air. Which would likely have a different personnel grouping. It’s all just a guess though, I don’t have any inside track info.

I just don’t understand the rationale for only giving him that one series last week unless we were saving him for something else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It looked like most of the throws were moving pocket or "three step". My fear is that "they are all going to play" is literally a promise, and they didn't the playbook is kinda disjointed as a result. The horizontal, screen/draw, intermediate game must have been deemed to dangerous for Clemson's speed, but ya idk.

On my second watch through, they had some stuff working until Clemson went 8/9 in the box. I really did not like the wide split WRs on the first series; very four corners gimmicky, and it ended up with TO isolated on Simmons too often.

 

[danny daniel]

It looked like most of the throws were moving pocket or "three step". My fear is that "they are all going to play" is literally a promise, and they didn't the playbook is kinda disjointed as a result. The horizontal, screen/draw, intermediate game must have been deemed to dangerous for Clemson's speed, but ya idk.

On my second watch through, they had some stuff working until Clemson went 8/9 in the box. I really did not like the wide split WRs on the first series; very four corners gimmicky, and it ended up with TO isolated on Simmons too often.

Simmons changed the whole trajectory of the game IMO. Oliver will do much better (if he gets another chance) against SF.

 

[33jacket]

For those players inked in boldface throughout all positions, what does that mean?

Sorry I’m still confused, but it’s kind of strange that there’s only one player listed in boldface ink under the Defensive End chart ... when I thought we had two defensive end starters?

Bold just means who started the prior week. Harvin is probably not highlighted was in error vs intentional

 

[MacJacket]

Simmons changed the whole trajectory of the game IMO. Oliver will do much better (if he gets another chance) against SF.

That guy has NFL superstar written all over him. I hope he stays healthy and goes this year if possible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[takethepoints]

I sure do wish Hansen could play, though Minihan appeared to do ok last week. We could use his size at guard.

 

[Whiskey_Clear]

We don’t have starters we have “boldeders.”

 

[MidtownJacket]

Yeah I am predicting we come out with Lucas ready to go to the air. Which would likely have a different personnel grouping. It’s all just a guess though, I don’t have any inside track info.

I just don’t understand the rationale for only giving him that one series last week unless we were saving him for something else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This aged well..

Thus ends my #LookAtMePost


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk