- Messages
- 11,519
I saw Notre Dame DBs do that yesterday (aside from the 20-plus deficit)I’d like to see our DB’s not waving their arms around in celebration after an opposing QB throws it out of bounds while we are down 20plus on 2nd and 9.
I saw Notre Dame DBs do that yesterday (aside from the 20-plus deficit)I’d like to see our DB’s not waving their arms around in celebration after an opposing QB throws it out of bounds while we are down 20plus on 2nd and 9.
Beat the spread and look decent/competitive doing it. This will cover most of the other "good" metrics. Having gone to my first Tech game in '62, I've learned that points are what matters.Subjective question. How will you define "good" on Monday by way of metrics across the 3 phases of the game?
Offense
Defense
Special Teams
Examples: Points, points per drive, yards per drive, red zone performance, turnovers, 3rd down conversions/stops, starting field position, etc.
Let's agree that a W is "good" (or better) performance for the team as a whole. If you disagree, see our get-bak coach @kg01 and state your case for "the list".
I agree with this, and I will add "no obvious coaching decisions or lack of decisions playing a part in the outcome". (i.e. misuse of timeouts, poor time management, etc.)A chance to win in the fourth quarter.
Nope,just keep it simple and controlled.If we do this ,the rest of the things take care of themselves--like last yr which was a real game unlike later..Beat the line by 8+ pts.
The maybe unnoticed factor might be the Clemson transfer ,Tchio, might have info about their team that might help us. btw-this works agin us in the ole Miss game.If it feels like theres a contest on the field.
I will also accept it if some knowledgeable poster here tells me something that makes me hopeful.
I used to read all sorts of pov on stats. The best, easiest one was from CPJ. He once said if you score at least 28 points, it is very likely you win.My high school coach played for Bill Belichick for a long time. Bill always said "Stats are for losers. Win the game." So that's how I'm going to quantify it.
That's absolutely true, but a close game would portend future wins, last year's result notwithstanding.A close game isn’t going to take the clown make up off. We gave these guys a close game last year and still are a joke. We have to win to change the perception.
Again true, but none of Bill Belichick's teams were ever on the short end of a 22-point spread.My high school coach played for Bill Belichick for a long time. Bill always said "Stats are for losers. Win the game." So that's how I'm going to quantify it.
Ultimately agreed. But if Geoff honestly thinks things are turning around we need to find a way to win and make a splash quickly. I don't think he'll make it to the end of the season if this is a massive blowout.I just want us to look like a power 5 team and be competitive. I doubt we will win but just keep it close for 3 quarters and I’ll be happy. I’m sick and tired of blowouts.