I think the biggest factor in our favor is that we have had the bye week instead of just a short week (like Clemson has) to prepare for this game. Because of this (and because it's Clemson), I think GT has a very realistic chance to be in this game (if not win it). It will be close either way. Another thing that would help is if Tajh Boyd, Sammy Watkins, and Vic Beasley all tripped down that slope running on to the field which btw is still the dumbest idea i've ever seen.
Oh, never mind. I just looked at their schedule and they have the same time to prepare that we do. Still, I think we have a fair chance because it's Clemson and anything can happen (see GT/Clemson game from 2011)Dude, unless I'm reading it wrong, I'm pretty sure each team will have had the same amount of time off by the time we play. You want to change your prediction now don't you?
On their hill, I think it's a neat tradition but does seem a bit risky.
I really hope you're right about that scoreI posted a thread on stingtalk comparing 2008 to 2013. It was the first year in the system, and we hadn't been playing that great. The only games in which we scored over 21 pts were the Jaybo games against MissSt and Duke and the FSU game. Going into the last two weeks we averaged about 22pts/game against FBS opponents. We had a bye before the Thursday night game against Miami and scored 41 followed by the 45 we scored against georgie.
I think the bye week sets up nice for us to get Vad and the offense calmed down and focussed and get the OL etc a little less banged-up. I think a lot of fans have under-appreciated the fact that we just played 8 straight weeks against FBS opponents, 7 of which played in bowls last year. That's a grueling schedule. When you combine that with already being bowl eligible, we should be loose and raring to go. Moreover, a VPI win this Saturday against d'oh U will mean that beating CU the following Thursday will give us a share of the regular season coastal at 6-2. CU on the other hand will be facing us and SCe in hopes of getting a BCS at-large. I think that they come in on a razor's edge between tight and cocky.
If we can stop them quick and score slow and steady a couple of times, then they'll melt. Also, Clowney was right about Boyd. He doesn't handle pressure well. Pitt only tasted a fraction of the blitz packages that Roof will unleash. It's going to be an ugly game fellas. GT 36 - CU 9.
I posted a thread on stingtalk comparing 2008 to 2013. It was the first year in the system, and we hadn't been playing that great. The only games in which we scored over 21 pts were the Jaybo games against MissSt and Duke and the FSU game. Going into the last two weeks we averaged about 22pts/game against FBS opponents. We had a bye before the Thursday night game against Miami and scored 41 followed by the 45 we scored against georgie.
I think the bye week sets up nice for us to get Vad and the offense calmed down and focussed and get the OL etc a little less banged-up. I think a lot of fans have under-appreciated the fact that we just played 8 straight weeks against FBS opponents, 7 of which played in bowls last year. That's a grueling schedule. When you combine that with already being bowl eligible, we should be loose and raring to go. Moreover, a VPI win this Saturday against d'oh U will mean that beating CU the following Thursday will give us a share of the regular season coastal at 6-2. CU on the other hand will be facing us and SCe in hopes of getting a BCS at-large. I think that they come in on a razor's edge between tight and cocky.
If we can stop them quick and score slow and steady a couple of times, then they'll melt. Also, Clowney was right about Boyd. He doesn't handle pressure well. Pitt only tasted a fraction of the blitz packages that Roof will unleash. It's going to be an ugly game fellas. GT 36 - CU 9.