dressedcheeseside
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 14,222
Having an elusive and fast qb doesn’t hurt, either!That's correct Fat... Different O optimizes what you have and designs plays to fit. The OL still did great!
Having an elusive and fast qb doesn’t hurt, either!That's correct Fat... Different O optimizes what you have and designs plays to fit. The OL still did great!
Thanks, I didn't do much more than paste your description into Image Creator and take the best of several iterations.You nailed it, man!
Now do some graphic magic of our D-line and a sieve.Thanks, I didn't do much more than paste your description into Image Creator and take the best of several iterations.
Which ten year span?I think we're about to be spoiled again. Great article here:
Inside The Chart: Line The Way
Technique, scheme and especially intangibles tell the story of the success of Tech's offensive lineramblinwreck.com
2008-2018 Some years absolutely fantastic, other years just very very good.Which ten year span?
They had a very clearly defined system and were coached to execute at a high level.2008-2018 Some years absolutely fantastic, other years just very very good.
Some my say elite level. JkThey had a very clearly defined system and were coached to execute at a high level.
I believe this poster has earned himself a banSome my say elite level. Jk
LolI believe this poster has earned himself a ban
Yup. Pass protection still needs a good bit of work. Not nearly as good as the run blocking!Having an elusive and fast qb doesn’t hurt, either!
Which brings me to my one wish for the OL in the off season. I want to see more flexibility and speed out of the whole bunch. (Btw, I'd like to see that in the DL too, but I digress.) I thought some of the guys were carrying about 10 - 15 pounds too much. I know that nowadays the preference is for OLs over 310. And that's ok, if the players in question are exceptional (Ugag is a good example). I'd rather see us trying to get most of our players down to 300 - 305. I'm not pushing a lean, mean fighting machine, a la Paul. Still, I think a bit more flex and foot speed would help, especially in pass protection.Having an elusive and fast qb doesn’t hurt, either!
Switching to the DL their technique really could use work this offseason. The DTs are very slow to react to the snap. They may just not have the quick twitch needed. I would think S&T training would help a lot there. They also get vertical way to quickly thus they get very little penetration/disruption. Again this is mostly technique. We need some serious coaching there.Which brings me to my one wish for the OL in the off season. I want to see more flexibility and speed out of the whole bunch. (Btw, I'd like to see that in the DL too, but I digress.) I thought some of the guys were carrying about 10 - 15 pounds too much. I know that nowadays the preference is for OLs over 310. And that's ok, if the players in question are exceptional (Ugag is a good example). I'd rather see us trying to get most of our players down to 300 - 305. I'm not pushing a lean, mean fighting machine, a la Paul. Still, I think a bit more flex and foot speed would help, especially in pass protection.
But, hey, this is just me. No doubt Key has sound opinions on the matter.
That's the ideal.It looks like we are building depth. I like the athleticism of some of the new recruits we signed. Develop the OL room organically. Redshirt, weight room, nutrition- work them into the rotation. Cultivate leadership from within the group. Have a plan of succession and a mindset of being the best. I think we are on our way. An elite OL equals a mature , hardworking team dedicated to winning that leads GT every year.
LOL. You should apply for their coaching job. You seem to know more about it than our current coachs. You guys are pathetic.Ha HaSwitching to the DL their technique really could use work this offseason. The DTs are very slow to react to the snap. They may just not have the quick twitch needed. I would think S&T training would help a lot there. They also get vertical way to quickly thus they get very little penetration/disruption. Again this is mostly technique. We need some serious coaching there.
Question for you. Are you able to see comparative speed between two objects when you watch them? For example, can you tell when two cars are at a stoplight and the light turns green whether one is quicker to move than another when one visibly moves first and gets through the intersection before the other (in other words there’s an obvious difference, say a Corvette versus a school bus)? Better example would he watching a drag race. If the camera work is good you can usually tell which car got off the line quicker than the other. And it doesn’t take a mechanical engineering degree or to be an automobile engineer in order to do so. When you see which car won you can speculate, without being a race mechanic, that one car might have more horsepower than the other or a better selection of gearing for the conditions and the track or just a driver with better reflexes. You won’t know for sure but you can probably say, without having to be an expert, that the car is lacking something and that the mechanics and engineers on that team probably need to work on that.LOL. You should apply for their coaching job. You seem to know more about it than our current coachs. You guys are pathetic.Ha Ha
What a stupid analogy. Ha Ha. Your point is really about ability, not coaching. Good grief. And 8 lines to say so little?Question for you. Are you able to see comparative speed between two objects when you watch them? For example, can you tell when two cars are at a stoplight and the light turns green whether one is quicker to move than another when one visibly moves first and gets through the intersection before the other (in other words there’s an obvious difference, say a Corvette versus a school bus)? Better example would he watching a drag race. If the camera work is good you can usually tell which car got off the line quicker than the other. And it doesn’t take a mechanical engineering degree or to be an automobile engineer in order to do so. When you see which car won you can speculate, without being a race mechanic, that one car might have more horsepower than the other or a better selection of gearing for the conditions and the track or just a driver with better reflexes. You won’t know for sure but you can probably say, without having to be an expert, that the car is lacking something and that the mechanics and engineers on that team probably need to work on that.
Actually my post is not about coaching at all. It IS about ability. It's about the ability of a normal person to evaluate something they see. But the fact that you got that the analogy is NOT about coaching shows it was a good analogy and you just didn't get the point. Not surprising. Sad that your only recourse is insults. It says so much about you.What a stupid analogy. Ha Ha. Your point is really about ability, not coaching. Good grief. And 8 lines to say so little?
PJ was absolutely brilliant taking average talent and making them elite based on his scheme and knowledge of how to make it go. The problem is the defense had average talent and no real scheme advantage. So the way we won was to score on most possessions and limit the number of possessions. It is so tough to win with average players without some scheme edge. The only time we really had a scheme on defense was under Tenuta. His scheme of heavy blitz also allowed him to recruit Linebackers who loved the aggressivenesss on defense. But in today's world of quick passes (almost West Coast in nature), I am doubtful it would work.They had a very clearly defined system and were coached to execute at a high level.