Not sure what you're saying here.I expect no less that five of what we consider "starting positions" now to change by fall. Happens every year.
That's a good question and I'm no expert but I think the fact that Uzzi and Shaq both played RG was coincidental. I think we ran behind our best OL a lot because he was our best OL. Where ever he is, we're gonna run behind him more often.Questions:
Is right guard the most important position on the OL? Shaq Mason, our best OL, played the position the past two years. Before him, our best OL was Uzzi, who played RG for 2010-2012 season.
If RG is the most important position, why? If not, which position is and why?
But Shaq started at LG until Uzzi graduated. And now it looks like we are taking an experienced LG in Braun and moving him to RG. That makes me think it is not a coincidence.That's a good question and I'm no expert but I think the fact that Uzzi and Shaq both played RG was coincidental. I think we ran behind our best OL a lot because he was our best OL. Where ever he is, we're gonna run behind him more often.
But Shaq started at LG until Uzzi graduated. And now it looks like we are taking an experienced LG in Braun and moving him to RG. That makes me think it is not a coincidence.
Not sure what you're saying here.
Y'all don't forget big From!!
Griffin is outI think the lineup gets the most experienced players on the field.
LT Griffin
LG Chamberlain
C Burden
RG Braun
RT Joe
It is very hard for a freshman or a redshirt freshman to get on the field as an OL. There is just so much to learn in knowing where to go and the timing of getting to your man. We have some excellent depth though. DeVine will play, he just may not start. I am hoping Brown gets to play some as well.
We will need 2 guards next year right?
What year is Joe?
I think JT tends to roll right... is that right?
Doesn't fat burn off before muscle?
No, unfortunately fat does not burn off before muscle. At least not consistently. When you lose weight, you lose muscle. Always. You may lose some fat too - but do not let anyone tell you that you do not lose muscle when you diet. No matter how it is advertised, there is no such thing as a diet that loses fat only and not muscle.
Its complex. Your body will, in general, preferentially use fat to make up for caloric deficits. That's the point of fat, so to speak. However, your body will also attempt to adjust its requirements over the long term, and absent a demand for more muscle metabolism in the form of working out will adjust your 'muscle maintenance' caloric budget downwards.I think they're putting it in the context of muscle building program rather than just diet.