Milwaukee
Banned
- Messages
- 7,277
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI
If you have Nike GT gear please send me pics first before you throw it out, I may take it off your hands.
Employees on a job (any job) don't have so-called First Amendment rights while on the job. The employer can set any rules he wants. What the employee says off the job is not the business of the employer, unless it affects the company (or whatever).From a purely non-political lens: They are a business, and the bottom line is the bottom line. There will be outrage among the Fox News crowd (average viewer age is 65), but that's not who is paying $150 for shoes. Younger people generally support (or aren't bothered) NFL players exercising their First Amendment rights, and that's the audience that Nike (and most non-pharmaceutical companies) covet. If you think a company like Nike cares about Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh railing against them, think again.
If the employer, ie the Team, gave a crap about the nonsense on the sidelines they’d do something about it. Or if the financial penalty was high enough, they might choose to act but it doesn’t look like that’s the case either. They either support what the players are doing or are indifferent. It’s their business. They can choose to make good or bad decisions because it’s their money.Employees on a job (any job) don't have so-called First Amendment rights while on the job. The employer can set any rules he wants. What the employee says off the job is not the business of the employer, unless it affects the company (or whatever).
If the employer, ie the Team, gave a crap about the nonsense on the sidelines they’d do something about it. Or if the financial penalty was high enough, they might choose to act but it doesn’t look like that’s the case either. They either support what the players are doing or are indifferent. It’s their business. They can choose to make good or bad decisions because it’s their money.
The individual fans can choose to keep watching, watch less or stop watching. Nobody’s twisting anyone’s arm. It’s a free country after all. Government’s not ramming football down our throats like they are other things.
The only pro game I MIGHT watch is the Super Bowl.Yes! There was a time many years ago when I watched every pro game possible. I became irritated with all of the showboating and ridiculous contracts so I turned them off and switched to college ball. Now, I average about two pro games per year instead of four games per week. I decided I didn’t want my time and dollars supporting that stuff and life has been better since.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'll keep up with scores and stats but i wont be watchingThe only pro game I MIGHT watch is the Super Bowl.
What do you think the NFL would do if attendance dropped every game until the stadiums were only 1/4 full?If the employer, ie the Team, gave a crap about the nonsense on the sidelines they’d do something about it. Or if the financial penalty was high enough, they might choose to act but it doesn’t look like that’s the case either. They either support what the players are doing or are indifferent. It’s their business. They can choose to make good or bad decisions because it’s their money.
The individual fans can choose to keep watching, watch less or stop watching. Nobody’s twisting anyone’s arm. It’s a free country after all. Government’s not ramming football down our throats like they are other things.
It's a free country, and as long as people aren't breaking the law, people can do as they please.
Yeah and this:Just from a purely numbers perspective I am surprised Nike did this. There was obvious blow back for his action that you could see in ratings and other ways.
I think you're right.Even if you wanted to minimize the blowback it was a significant percentage of the public. I have to guess they believe the segment that buys their expensive stuff is younger and more socially liberal
It’s a ballsy move no doubt. I wouldn’t bet against them though. I’m not sure % of NFL fans = % of jersey buying people if that makes any sense. Time will tell.Just from a purely numbers perspective I am surprised Nike did this. There was obvious blow back for his action that you could see in ratings and other ways. Even if you wanted to minimize the blowback it was a significant percentage of the public. I have to guess they believe the segment that buys their expensive stuff is younger and more socially liberal (no commentary just trying to figure it out). The older folks must not buy enough Nike???
The people who run Nike are extremely leftist and that has a whole lot to do with it.It’s a ballsy move no doubt. I wouldn’t bet against them though. I’m not sure % of NFL fans = % of jersey buying people if that makes any sense. Time will tell.
In the grand scheme of things, the fact that grown men kneeling is offensive to other grown men shows where we are as a society in 2018. Politicians and pundits profit off the outrage. It's a free country, and as long as people aren't breaking the law, people can do as they please.
Anyone give a tangible example of how their life is impacted (hurt feelings don't count) whether everyone stands or kneels during the anthem, whether Nike signs or drops Kap? Pretty sure I have to go to work tomorrow and feed my family either way.
Their workers in China will have no idea about thisCheesy move by Nike. Where was their support when all of this started? It's just a corporate gimmick and people will fall for it. They're in the business for making $$$. Wonder what their factory workers think about all of this.
Cheesy move by Nike. Where was their support when all of this started? It's just a corporate gimmick and people will fall for it. They're in the business for making $$$. Wonder what their factory workers think about all of this.