Yes, varying degrees of injury at different times. Thought I first noticed it in the GaST game and, while watching, I flashed back to the FSU game in which an announcer said something about King holding his shoulder after a play. I also noted that Haynes didn’t look quite right and I chalked it up at the time to his being sore from the previous game and having insufficient rehab time.
Absolutely agree that this is part of football and am in no way implying that Tech should get special dispensation for what is common to all teams. Just saying it would have been fun to see what could have been and that 8-9 wins, with or without a bowl win, looked plausible to me.
Miami, Clemson, SMU are top 3 in acc.
The qb for these teams have zero games or revised game plan due to injury. SMU has had a very easy schedule.
Our swing and screen pass offense mimics the old cpj offense,but it passes instead of laterals. It requires the qb to run and not throw int. 23
offense was protecting the terrible defense and QB was not injured - ran and passed for great yards but had games with excessive interceptions. 24 offense was designed to be more run oriented- thus qb 1 and qb 2 have been injured.
That's the bad news.
The good news is defense has stepped up and we see qb 3 has lots of potential.
The better news is most of the teams we play next year will have new qb while we have a qb roomful of Tech men
.