Techcaster572
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 296
If you guys go today, come down to the 3rd base line and say hello.
Love chatting with fellow Tech baseball fans...
Love chatting with fellow Tech baseball fans...
Another positive is NC State played this as a game to win and used some of their best relief pitching trying to hold. Taking down their number one stopper and keeping him away from Sunday was big.It's great baseball when we win, good baseball when both teams play well and we lose.
The good:
The not good:
- Team has real momentum since the uGa series and Northeastern game. Talked to in video clip in this: https://ramblinwreck.com/zmarzlak-homers-tech-past-no-13-nc-state/
- Cavemen are back, 4 HRs in a game. Burress 2 HRs in a game, still unbelievable. But Zmarziak 8th inning HR to take lead was one of the most memorable plays of the year. As Zmarziak said in the video clip, he was just trying to damage the baseball. Authentic caveman.
- Comeback wins are more satisfying than holding on to win.
- Defense overall was good especially Jones at 1st (one error cost us 2 runs) and we worked out of a lot of tight positions. Turned another inning ending DP with bases loaded in the 6th.
- New guys to the team gave up 1 ER in 6.0 IP. We have far more depth in pitching than we have had in past years. Need to keep shuffling the deck and keeping the performers.
- Brett Thomas was amazing - 15 pitches for 2.0 to close.
- View attachment 15903
- Coaching was good. Pulling Finateri in T3rd when he loaded bases with no outs was good IMHO.
- Series win over ranked team. (At home, would have been better to play @NC State )
- NC State was 0-9 RISP. That was good for us and bad for them; I think RISP works out over time and we were lucky.
- Our strike % was only 54.3%. That won't do it when the cavemen aren't out to play.
- Finateri had a rough outing. Kovala was wild but only gave up 1 ER.
Another positive is NC State played this as a game to win and used some of their best relief pitching trying to hold. Taking down their number one stopper and keeping him away from Sunday was big.
I’ll gloat. I was 1 of only 3 that picked us to win 3.
I picked 3 wins as well. I did hours of analysis on the matchup. Factored in weather... the home field. Due factor. To name a few.I’ll gloat. I was 1 of only 3 that picked us to win 3.
If you're saying this... it's likely too late.I’m going to try not to get excited until about halfway through the conference schedule.
Same here, but I am very excited about the defense and depth of the pitching staff the year. The number of walks this weekend were very concerning but NC State gave up a lot of walks too.I’m going to try not to get excited until about halfway through the conference schedule.
Not clowns, battered GT fan syndrome.It was so obvious we'd sweep. Not sure what those "non 3 wins" clowns were thinking.
Leading the horse [old man] to water... it worked!! This is great.
Ignore Nolan. His projections (this early) are not accurate. & Ga Tech's post-season prospects hinge on being over .500 in conference play & beating Auburn at least once... twice is better.Absolutely love this.
Team chemistry this year is just different in a much better way.
Coach Hall seems to be more reinvigorated. I know many aren't necessarily fans of coach however I can say with absolutely NO DOUBTS that parents and players (Including the BIG ALUM -Mark Texiera) completely love Coach Hall.
I love the make-up of this team.
Depth and talent.
This sweep says more about Tech than it does about NC State. We just swept a likely tournament team.
Our RPI moved up to 77 from 91 however ugag just got swept and they sit at 33. What a joke.
Before today's sweep, warren nolan's site predicted Tech to go 12-18 in the conference. After the sweep, they now project to go 10-20. What an absolute joke.
I like how this team is playing. Need to keep it rolling against Ga State as midweek games are very important.
I'm not even going to talk about unCheat cause State is next and I'll be at Panthersville to watch tech win 9 straight!!!
go get em BOYS!!!
Agree. It is WAY TOO EARLY to care about RPI. We need at least 3 more weeks, probably more like 4 or 5 before RPI becomes reflective of team strength. That said, when it becomes late enough for RPI to matter, the board in general should remember that RPI is simply a mathematical formula. It can be gamed somewhat by playing a really tough schedule (see Notre Dame) with most of those tough games being on the road, but other than the complaint about the "good loss" (no such thing in my mind), it is simply reflective of how good your team has performed and how well your team's opponents have performed, with a little bit of weighting towards playing tough teams away from home. Even with UGa's sweep this weekend they have a better record than us, with more games on the road, and only one series against a laughably bad opponent as opposed to our two. They should be ranked higher than us. As several on this board have bemoaned in the pre-season, our non-conference schedule will not allow us to make the NCAA tournament without at least a .500 record in conference, and likely we need a winning record in conference.Ignore Nolan. His projections (this early) are not accurate. & Ga Tech's post-season prospects hinge on being over .500 in conference play & beating Auburn at least once... twice is better.
Though I agree that his site is relatively worthless, I will say this about RPI.....early or not...It matters.Agree. It is WAY TOO EARLY to care about RPI. We need at least 3 more weeks, probably more like 4 or 5 before RPI becomes reflective of team strength. That said, when it becomes late enough for RPI to matter, the board in general should remember that RPI is simply a mathematical formula. It can be gamed somewhat by playing a really tough schedule (see Notre Dame) with most of those tough games being on the road, but other than the complaint about the "good loss" (no such thing in my mind), it is simply reflective of how good your team has performed and how well your team's opponents have performed, with a little bit of weighting towards playing tough teams away from home. Even with UGa's sweep this weekend they have a better record than us, with more games on the road, and only one series against a laughably bad opponent as opposed to our two. They should be ranked higher than us. As several on this board have bemoaned in the pre-season, our non-conference schedule will not allow us to make the NCAA tournament without at least a .500 record in conference, and likely we need a winning record in conference.
You triggered me. Happens every year. Two things are true...Though I agree that his site is relatively worthless, I will say this about RPI.....early or not...It matters.
Problem is we'd have to go 19-11 or 20-10 in conference to even stand a chance at hosting because it puts Tech behind the 8 ball. What you describe above barely gets tech in the tournament.
The same garbage happens in pre season college football games via rankings.
Because uga is at 33, they could go 16-14 in the sec and possibly host.
I'm not saying uga shouldn't be above us however 40+ spots...No
I knew uga wasn't that good and if we hold onto a 9-3 lead in the 7th and Charlie Condon doesn't rob Cam Jones of a line drive in the 8th in athens, we could've possibly taken both games from them. In the end, we didn't but uga isn't that good yet they are getting rewarded for playing a relatively weak schedule so far and we are getting punished for an even worse schedule.
First team they play and they get swept with a run rule.
Why is nc state ahead of us? We swept them and have a better record....IJS 20+ spots ahead of us. Their record is 12-6 and swept by us. We're 15-4.
BTW- Notre Dame is 11 in the latest rpi. Overall record is 11-8 0-6 in acc
Fred,You triggered me. Happens every year. Two things are true...
1) RPI is what matters
2) RPI is flawed ..... & that sucks.
The weighted RPI gives a team waaaay too much credit for road wins & waaay too little for home wins.
Notre Dame? ... they have played ONE (of 19 games) at home. It's flawed. I wish I knew IF the committee (in May) really does try to adjust. Eventually.. ND will play more home games but they will have an inflated RPI simply because they play more road games.
NC State has a road series win at Hawaii who is above .500.
Ga Tech's opponents winning % is not great. Time will tell if UGA, NE, & others help or not.
Just need to win & make it easy for the committee come late May.
RPI needs to be fixed and/or committee needs to call me before they make any rash decisions.
View attachment 15904
You triggered me. Happens every year. Two things are true...
1) RPI is what matters
2) RPI is flawed ..... & that sucks.
The weighted RPI gives a team waaaay too much credit for road wins & waaay too little for home wins.
Notre Dame? ... they have played ONE (of 19 games) at home. It's flawed. I wish I knew IF the committee (in May) really does try to adjust. Eventually.. ND will play more home games but they will have an inflated RPI simply because they play more road games.
NC State has a road series win at Hawaii who is above .500.
Ga Tech's opponents winning % is not great. Time will tell if UGA, NE, & others help or not.
Just need to win & make it easy for the committee come late May.
RPI needs to be fixed and/or committee needs to call me before they make any rash decisions.
View attachment 15904
& like democracy I will jump up & down screaming about how awful the least worst alternative is.SSDY. At some point we should find the thread where we have killed this topic every year.
I agree it is flawed and like democracy, the least worse alternative. And the 60/40 split for home/away is way too much.
And it very much matters to make NCAAT. Its the "law" and no one should be surprised by it. ( I know you aren't.)
The problem for us is the teams we have played are expected to be so weak at season end that we will have a hard time making tourney unless we win 16 of 30 ACC games. And a much harder time hosting. IIWII