It's troubling to me that someone who supposedly has expertise on defense
MAY HAVE watched what happened this past season without intervening.
I mean, wouldn't you have stepped in to fix something that was
obviously broken if you knew how to do so? So, was this just
laissez-faire coaching?
Alternatively, what if CGC did sit in on the meetings with the defense...and what we saw was as good as he could produce? <shudder>
So, here are the possibilities:
- He didn't think the defense was broken. (In which case, wth?)
- He knew the defense was broken but took a hands-off management approach. (In which case, we need a new HC.)
- He knew the defense was broken and tried to fix it, but couldn't. (In which case, we need a new DC or some new players or both.)
Regardless of which option you choose, you
almost can't avoid the conclusion: CGC ain't the guy.
I say "almost" because there is fourth possibility...one I think a lot of folks are clinging to...and that is that CGC was simply stretched too thin to be able to intervene. In which case, hiring the new OC will allow CGC to concentrate on the defense, and we'll see some improvements on both sides of the ball this year.