Works both ways. There's also a danger to having someone perform at a higher level than his competition, only to be relegated to his place on the bench. You have to choose one, so I think Yates is the guy.
Think twice ( before you answer) you are the Head Coach with 4 more years which do you play now ?
If he doesn't pick the right one, ha may not have four more years.
The one who is performing the best. Since the beginning of football this is how its always been done. Sims will be given every chance to earn his job back but you don’t replace a player who is getting it done.
That is what I thought after week one but the fact is no money and the AD will not let him go .
I didn’t realize picking a starting QB was supposed to be a popularity contest. Leaving the best performer on the bench is a good way to kill team chemistry.
Look I'm not picking one over the other , But Sims was the starter got hurt Yates plays very good. Now lets say Sims is fine after next week looks better in practice the players picked him as team captain now which one do you pick, The player who has done well in a few games but not as good in practice that is not a good message for players. practice doesn't matter just the games or the one who was the starter before he got hurt and has had a better showing in practice also not a good message to send to the players that practice doesn't mean anything if you get hurt to bad. ( when the time comes we will see CGC earn his money without losing part of the team.
Lay actually started the game yesterday at guard (see the participation report). I was surprised to see that however have to trust the coaches belief in that he earned the playing time.
Was with B** L****
I’m glad I missed that bastard’s tenure. All I hear is he was the worst. I left the country the year after winning the National Championship & slightly disappointed in our season but having enjoyed the Aloha Bowl, come back 3 years later and find our Team a complete ****ing disaster.
