Agree that, while trick plays can be fun, they should never be part of our meat and potatoes offense. We confuse defenses plenty with our "gimmicky offense" without adding gimmicks.Trick plays too often are the last resort of a desperate, in this case, team, and certainly the Duke game was desperate. That crazy pass play to Thomas against Clemson in '09 was interesting even if it was later determined to be illegal. The occasional fake punt, which I don't consider to really be a trick play, I kinda get. (That fake FG by Georgia was a trick for sure and really well done, but even after that they came out of it with three points.) I'm glad we have them, I just know what it means when we use them. Now, that wheel route is something else, the highlight reel being the '11(?) throw to Tony Zenon who lined up at Bback on the game's first play and before Middle Tennessee could spot it, Zenon was manned up on the middle linebacker out and to the sideline. Really a cool play. Not sure if it would be considered a trick play or not, though it tricked MTSU. Not sure when that play should be used against what defense so I am an agnostic. The basic option is tricky enough for me.
That's really a good question. Every one -- I am violating my own absolute certainty rule here, and I bet at least one some one will dispute that -- has acknowledged that the difference in Thomas from the first six or seven games to the last five or six was almost startling, and the O line was better. But given the track record of to-the-wire decisions, I think maybe about the same, maybe 10 points difference, but maybe not a nail biter to the end? As one poster noted Foster seems to be the one guy who apparently tries to think a move ahead of Johnson rather than stay with him and react. Whatever he does works.What do yall think the score would have been if we had played VT late in the season last year?
38-7.What do yall think the score would have been if we had played VT late in the season last year?
Agree that, while trick plays can be fun, they should never be part of our meat and potatoes offense. We confuse defenses plenty with our "gimmicky offense" without adding gimmicks.
Also remember that it took a ridiculous fluke bounce right into the QBs hands in stride to put them in the lead. We looked clearly like the better team that day, and we overcame the luck to still win.VT certainly did last season, and it took a great play -- passing, not running -- to get us in a position to tie and then win. Thomas had a lot of yards on the ground that game, as I remember, and we still really struggled. I know, I know. Thomas and the O line were untested. But seems to me the jailbreak mode is about as good as you can defend this option. Hit us before we hit you kind of thing.
They couldn't score at the end of the season, and no one could stop us from doing so. I don't think a blowout would have been an unreasonable expectation. Hell, we beat the second best team in the SEC by two touchdowns, and it could have been 49-13 (three of their touchdowns were on a Hail Mary, a drive that should have ended in a fumble, and a garbage time score). At the end of the season we were one of the five best teams in the country.38-7? 54-17? Goodness, fellows. Only thing I can figure is that it was 5 o'clock somewhere. Or while Thomas was spinning his miracles he turned your tap water into wine. I love the optimism, though.
And we didn't run the same plays we did against MSU in the second half of the OB. Had we done that, who knows what would have happened.VT certainly did last season, and it took a great play -- passing, not running -- to get us in a position to tie and then win. Thomas had a lot of yards on the ground that game, as I remember, and we still really struggled. I know, I know. Thomas and the O line were untested. But seems to me the jailbreak mode is about as good as you can defend this option. Hit us before we hit you kind of thing.
They did the season before, but they played us very differently last year. They didn't have the LB jumping the snap and they were much more limited in how they attacked our line.VT certainly did last season, and it took a great play -- passing, not running -- to get us in a position to tie and then win. Thomas had a lot of yards on the ground that game, as I remember, and we still really struggled. I know, I know. Thomas and the O line were untested. But seems to me the jailbreak mode is about as good as you can defend this option. Hit us before we hit you kind of thing.
38-7? 54-17? Goodness, fellows. Only thing I can figure is that it was 5 o'clock somewhere. Or while Thomas was spinning his miracles he turned your tap water into wine. I love the optimism, though.
About what? The optimism, yes. Even excessive optimism. I love Thomas to pieces but unless he plays all the positions all the time we are a tad too exuberant. Shouldn't we at least give him one more season? First the funeral, then the eulogy. The tap water into wine? Nah. Just had no other way to figure it.Are you sure about that?
Looking forward to the VPI game this year. As good as JT was against them last year.....he was 2x better by the end of the season. I predict VPI will play us fairly well....but their players are gonna hate trying to stop JT this year.
Believe me, I hope every one of you guys are right. I'd like to mash up on VT because it is a great rivalry and they are always hard on us and well-coached. The same for Clemson: great teams, great rivalry. Beat up on the good rivalries because it means more. Georgia is, well, Georgia, but always a good game. I want to beat UNC bad just because. Same with Duke. ND because of its reputation, much of it self aggrandizement, and the playoffs in '13 proved reputation will go a long way but sooner or later one has to prove it on the field. The NC States and Virginias don't get a rise from me one way or the other. All of which is to say I just don't see us taking VT apart. They will come to play. You note some good points, but: Thomas was not "extremely new" to the offense. He alternated starting in 2013. He got a bunch better as a starter, but it wasn't his first barn raising. Get past him and we still the the issues at Bback, Aback and WRs. They are not inconsequential problem areas and Thomas himself might be used as the example of why there is no substitute for experience, as the folk song goes. I'll abstain from excessive exuberance and start fresh with Alcorn State.I'll go ahead and say it. We will take Virginia Tech apart on Thursday night. Your point about Justin Thomas is exactly right. He was extremely new to our offense last year in Blacksburg, and still we found a way. Our offense has grown immeasurably complex with his talents. Our offensive line will, for the first time in recent memory, be physically superior to the Hokie defensive line, changing this match-up from a contest of scheme against scheme to a game of smash-mouth inside, with blazing speed on the edge, sprinkled with timely possession passing. We will be unstoppable on offense, and good enough on defense to contend with Virginia Tech's plodding attack.
About what? The optimism, yes. Even excessive optimism. I love Thomas to pieces but unless he plays all the positions all the time we are a tad too exuberant. Shouldn't we at least give him one more season? First the funeral, then the eulogy. The tap water into wine? Nah. Just had no other way to figure it.
I predict VPI will play us fairly well....but their players are gonna hate trying to stop JT this year.
It kind of reminded me of their strategy against us from the year before when they kept having their CB who was up in the box blitz the snap every time.
I think the idea that some Tech fans have that he's some sort of kryptonite for our offense is pretty intriguing. Our first year, I believe it was the fourth game of the year running a brand new offense
the second year we dominated them in the second half
the third year we were dominating them again until Nesbitt got hurt (and even then almost won
the fourth year we scored 26 points on them (they allowed 17.6/game)
the fifth year was the opener on the road
the sixth year we couldn't beat ourselves more than they beat us (but they played very well)
The idea that, because he talked to Iowa's coaches or something, he has the thing figured out always makes me laugh.