It's' amazing that there's a place for Jim Chaney who is all but retired, but possibly not Key.Maybe Key will still be on staff just not head coach. That’s still a possibility.
A lot of private universities are in trouble. For a private school, I’d want to see the enrollment over time and the endowment.How is that a detriment? I'd argue a lot of schools should reduce their degree offerings?
I spent a lot of time there about 10 years ago before I retired. They were a customer of mine. Great people and lovely setting, but it was obviously past its glory days then.I am very familiar with Tulane, it's campus and what it is today and what it was.
isn't there a bit of a difference in taking over a team mid season, losing your top 2 qb's, beating a couple top 25 teams, and finishing .500, vs taking 7 years to build up a .500 program?So is that a yes or a no? I mean surely a .500 record as head coach speaks for itself right?
isn't there a bit of a difference in taking over a team mid season, losing your top 2 qb's, beating a couple top 25 teams, and finishing .500, vs taking 7 years to build up a .500 program?
I've wondered that, too - if he's not considering Brent because he isn't "his guy". His job is to make the best hire fort Georgia Tech, not himself. But I think if he hires Brent, he should certainly get credit for doing so. Brent would become "his guy".AD's like to bring in their own guy. He may be shooting himself in the foot with this one. I am a little concerned that Batt is on a fast track and may not be around long. It's hard to hit a moving target as they say in industry.
In a one-size-fits-all world? Yes, it does. No need to get below the surface of that. No need for context or circumstance. That's all you need to know.So is that a yes or a no? I mean surely a .500 record as head coach speaks for itself right?
nopeMaybe Key will still be on staff just not head coach. That’s still a possibility.
Here is my 2 cents on the current situation. I think writing is on the wall that Key is not the hire. I think McCollum leaving signaled that much. Does that mean the team has been told who the coach is.... if so it's a thousand percent Fritz after this weekend. If the team has been told it's not Key but not named a coach yet that doesn't make sense to me. If it's not Fritz then I think it will be a name we are completely surprised by. Lastly, I do find it interesting Batt passing over Key if option 1 and 2 did not work out. Seems like Key would have been safe for Batt on a number of levels. So for him to go a different direction tells me he really liked Fritz or whoever it is. Secondarily what about Key was such a turnoff???
Have you seen this? I know that the Tech people will cry about how the rankings are biased, but there is a little school that is ranked 49th and our Institute is ranked 44. I wonder how they do so well.
Also, there are better football schools ranked higher than us. The elitism that Tech people have are the reason why we aren't very good. Its also the reason why we don't have side-walk fans.
I do.No, we wouldn't. GTAA was starving CPJ for resources. Now, had we INVESTED in the program at that time, we would be in a different space.
CPJ said one thing that has always resonated with me. Tech is closer to a service academy in the importance of athletics to the university, the resources, and the quality and skill of the athletes. We just don't want to admit that.
I think if Key was going to be hired it would have happened already.
Count me in as a Key-homer but Batt I think wants to hire someone new and fresh. He sees things from an AD view and a fan’s.
But if the best we can do is Willie Friggin Fritz then go ahead and dismiss us ever being relevant again. It would be the absolute dumbest thing but not surprising in the least. Making dumb decisions and being the smartest people in the room is what Tech does.
That's an oversimplification.
Any conscientious position coach will do the best he can with what he has to work with. Any employee does. Any parent does.
But you must believe that Key is simply incompetent and unqualified to be OL coach. Why would you say that when both GOL and Saban felt otherwise?
I mean, I know you know this, but it's not like the dude's got no bona fides:
2001–2002 Georgia Tech (GA) 2004 Western Carolina (TE/RB) 2005 UCF (GA/OL) 2006–2007 UCF (TE/RC) 2008 UCF (ST/TE/RC) 2009–2011 UCF (OL/RC) 2012–2013 UCF (AHC/OL/RC) 2014–2015 UCF (AHC/OC/OL/RC) 2016–2018 Alabama (OL) 2019–2022 Georgia Tech (AHC/OL/RGC) 2022–present Georgia Tech (interim HC)
[
Not even close to Collins. Tulane did not decrease in performance. They doubled their yearly wins. I agree that it’s hard to be excited about the record even though Fritz doubled their win percentage.
You could say Fritz decreased GSU performance, but not including their jump up in conference the year he arrived would be less than telling the whole story.
I don’t like that he hired Long as OC though.
Fritz is a good proven coach, just not a flashy record on till this year.
is Fritz on other's lists? would we be competing with him to come here?
Pepperidge farm remembers.Only a Tulane alum understands the depths of despair that Tulane has been through over 5 decades with only brief interruptions for limited success. Only when Tommy Bowden coached and then Willie Fritz did the program truly improve consistently. Tulane v. LSU was like GT v. UGA when I was there, but Tulane dropped out of the SEC and dropped LSU and became irrelevant in LA. They built an on campus stadium about 8 or 9 years ago (they played in the Sugar Bowl when I was there and packed 10,000 into a 70,000 seat stadium and then played in the Superdome and did worse). This was not a rebuild but a resurrection. Now, I am not saying Willie is the best option for GT (that's above my pay grade), but I will say he can coach, the players, the school and the city love him and were I his agent I would tell him to stay put. I am sure he aspires to see what he can do in a P5 conference. I would not bet against him. In a lot of ways he is CPJ 2.0 not Chan 2.0 but without some of the stubbornness and combative nature.
Are we actually in agreement here?I just can’t agree on the passing side. We threw mostly in proportion to the talent we had at QB, WR, and AB.