Notre Dame will beat Army by 20Navy got killed because of 6 (count 'em six) turnovers. If you turn the ball over like that and don't get killed, something is wrong with the universe. We'll see how ND does against Army where turnovers just don't happen. It'll all come down to how ND does against the QB power plays with Bryson Daily. I'm guessing that'll be a closer game.
From my vantage point, injuries have eaten us up this year. King has played injured most of the season, and so has Pyron. We were playing tFR Carrie yesterday… he’s our fifth string RB (Haynes, Cooley, Alexander, and Maddox). We’re down two of our top TE’s (Seither and Goede). Our top WR is hurt (Malik). That’s just too much to overcome, IMPO.
Hopefully, this 2-week respite will allow these guys to heal up so we can finish strong.
Saving his red shirt by only playing in 4 games. Word was he was injured beginning of season.Ethan MacKenney makes an appearance. Where’s he been all season? Has he been injured, too.
Not sure Army will fumble 6 times. I’d bet on Army if someone gave me 20.Notre Dame will beat Army by 20
From what i saw of ND, I'd take 20 points and their opponent almost 100% of the time. I don't think they have the horsepower on O to run people off of the field under normal (not 6 TO's) circumstances.Not sure Army will fumble 6 times. I’d bet on Army if someone gave me 20.
I will take your side if ND DT #99 is not playing.Not sure Army will fumble 6 times. I’d bet on Army if someone gave me 20.
Some notes on our offense.
GT has scored on its first or second possession of the game every game this season.
It has failed to score on the next drive against every FBS opponent. It has failed to score more than twice in the first half against every power conference team (incl ND).
Third quarters have been largely a disaster for the offense except for the UNC game. UNC and L'ville (FG) are the only 2 power teams GT has scored against in the 3rd quarter.
In the other games against power conference opponents it has been the third or fourth possession of the second half before the offense has scored.
It feels like the offense starts out well with its scripted plays. But once the defense adjusts it seems like it takes GT 1 1/2 to 2 quarters to figure out a counter to the defensive adjustments.
It also feels like the offense really only works consistently when King is out there. His running ability - specifically his speed which allows him to both hit holes faster and get to the edge easier than our backup QB's, makes the whole running game work. Defenses have to pay alot more attention to him in the run game than our other QB's. His running ability creates more space for our RB's.
With King we will be a significant underdog against Miami, without King it could get very ugly, unless is it like a +4 TO game. Miami has scored on 66% of its possessions against power conference teams. That includes a 52% TD possession rate (32 TDs in 61 possessions). FSU was the first team to hold Miami to fewer than 5 TD's - that was largely due to the number of possessions. Miami only had 8 possessions on Saturday ending with 4 TDs, 3 FGs and 1 punt. In 6 games against power conference teams Miami has 12 punts with 4 coming against Cal. No one else has forced more than 2.
They do have 8 turnovers in those 6 games - 5 INT, 2 fumbles, 1 downs - though 5 of those 8 were by Cal and VT.
FSU held them to a season low 36 points.
Their qb is not good at reading defense and Brent PRYE used a bunch of creative plays to get gash plays on our defensive line - that is playing like angry violent men.I am going to be cautious about this take, but it is what I thought when we chose Key.
I believe Key is a solid coach who won't embarrass the Institute, but I believe his ceiling is probably 8 wins, and that is me being generous, in my opinion.
I hope he proves me wrong, but so far, he has not.
With that said, I'm not sure we could ever obtain a coach in today's CFB environment that could reach double digit wins with our financial constraints and the current professional minor league status of CFB. It's hard to win against good to great teams without a strong DL, and I don't think we've had one for many years. Who is the coach in waiting out there who can be the smartest guy in the room and also suddenly recruit big nasties to GT?
Lastly, I realize that it wasn't the D that cost us the game against VPSIU, but I'm not sure I consider them a top 40 offense either.
Like I've said, I'm betting that when Philo take over it will be Jamais Winston, part deux. No need to run all that much, just throw the ball. But we'll see what Buster/.Weinke do if he wins out in spring over Pyron. That is NOT a done deal, btw.I think you really have something here, receivers just were not used to his balls, the kid is a real passer, receivers and passing game under Philo will be much different if he has good coaching (QB and OC). I think the QB coaching is probably good, I'm reserving judgement on the OC. Hope CBK can figure it out before kid becomes our regular QB which with what I've seen he will do.
It looks to me like our offensive game plan this year has been to reduce INTs. We haven't been throwing deep as much this year, and when we have, we're not connecting on it very often. This has led to more teams stacking the box against us, making it much harder to run the ball.Our offensive gameplan this year has NOT been designed to get 25+ passing TDs.
This requires a lockdown OL. Will we have that?Like I've said, I'm betting that when Philo take over it will be Jamais Winston, part deux. No need to run all that much, just throw the ball. But we'll see what Buster/.Weinke do if he wins out in spring over Pyron. That is NOT a done deal, btw.
Nor is it a done deal that King won't be back for another year. What does that mean for Pyron/Philo/Knowles?Like I've said, I'm betting that when Philo take over it will be Jamais Winston, part deux. No need to run all that much, just throw the ball. But we'll see what Buster/.Weinke do if he wins out in spring over Pyron. That is NOT a done deal, btw.
If Key can string a few classes together like the current one and keep enough of the guys around, I think there would be enough talent to hit 9+ wins on years with more favorable schedules in the new uneven scheduling world.I am going to be cautious about this take, but it is what I thought when we chose Key.
I believe Key is a solid coach who won't embarrass the Institute, but I believe his ceiling is probably 8 wins, and that is me being generous, in my opinion.
I hope he proves me wrong, but so far, he has not.
With that said, I'm not sure we could ever obtain a coach in today's CFB environment that could reach double digit wins with our financial constraints and the current professional minor league status of CFB. It's hard to win against good to great teams without a strong DL, and I don't think we've had one for many years. Who is the coach in waiting out there who can be the smartest guy in the room and also suddenly recruit big nasties to GT?
Lastly, I realize that it wasn't the D that cost us the game against VPSIU, but I'm not sure I consider them a top 40 offense either. (per the team stats, they certainly aren't)
And this is why I question spending 500 million dollars when we may not even be able to have a P4 team to play thereUnfortunately, I think this season is indicative of what the challenge is for most mid-tier teams in the new NIL & Transfer Portal landscape. Unless you can afford to pay quality depth to remain on your team, you are 1-2 injuries away from a sustained losing streak. Our ones can play with (almost) anyone but our depth is sorely lacking, and if we develop someone, there's a good chanceOle Misssome random football factory will pay them well to enter the portal.
Some people are less inclined to simply concede.And this is why I question spending 500 million dollars when we may not even be able to have a P4 team to play there
Conceding and being voted off the island are two different things. We are not in the two media darling conferences which will likely evolve into the P2 super conferences. Money is undefeatedSome people are less inclined to simply concede.