GT VT Post Game

Heisman's Ghost

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,944
Location
Albany Georgia
stinger78 said:
I was watching Ole Miss - OU game. You want to see WR's open, watch a game like that. 3-4 steps. We rarely see that. Singleton had that once today and Pyron got hit just as he was about to throw. It's always a step late.

ETA: Why? I believe it's because our guys run crappy, rounded routes. Just my $.02 worth.
Click to expand...
Ole Miss has a far better quarterback, a true gunslinger, and wide receivers who will take your lunch money if you so much as peek into the backfield. They are a fringe playoff team playing at a high level.
 

Heisman's Ghost

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,944
Location
Albany Georgia
wvGT11 said:


Key Mentioned that Ricky didn't make the trip, guess he has been terminated

Key also talks about how replay challenges work ,.good info
Click to expand...

You see coaches talk about players not making a trip for disciplinary reasons but this is the first time I have ever seen a coach not make a trip and it be mentioned on a post game show as though he was a player. Strange times indeed.
 

Heisman's Ghost

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,944
Location
Albany Georgia
Randy Carson said:
View attachment 17073

No, Chicken Little, the sky is not falling.

At 5-4, we are EXACTLY where all the savants predicted we would be. Are we looking sharp, like a well-oiled machine? Of course not. That's why we are 5-4 and right where we were expected to be at this point in the season.

Going forward, we can expect a loss against Miami followed by a big win at home against NC State (to get bowl eligible) followed by another loss in Athens to end the regular season at 6-6. The outcome of the Lackluster Middling Bowl depends on who our opponent is, of course.

NEXT year, we need to stay on our upward trajectory by winning at least 7 games. After that, I'd really like to see us winning eight games as a floor consistently. That will depend on recruiting and who's calling the plays on both sides of the ball two years from now.

But for now, while recognizing that 5-7 is still possible, 6-6 is what I have been expecting for this season. That appears to be the likely outcome, IMO.
Click to expand...
5-7 is not just possible, it is now even money. NC State is more than capable of beating this team. They are not great or even good, or even average just mediocre like us and Virginia Tech. The usual ACC middle of the pack and lower teams that infest the conference like fleas on a hound dog.
 

Heisman's Ghost

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,944
Location
Albany Georgia
stinger78 said:
QB injuries: King, Pyron
RQ injuries: Haynes, Cooley, Alexander, Maddox, Carrie
WR injuries: Rutherford, Blackburn (?)
TE injuries: Seither, Goede, Beetham, Hawes

The offensive injuries have been pretty epic. Still, we're on schedule to get a bowl bid. Not what any of us hoped after beating FSU, but still there.
Click to expand...
Very similar to 2015 in that regard. Funny how it seems as though all of them are on offense.
 

Heisman's Ghost

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,944
Location
Albany Georgia
roadkill said:
To reinforce your point and to counter @Dottie1145's some more, FEI ranked VT's offense #39 going into the game. That's decent and significantly above average in FBS. Their ranking will probably drop some due to the performance of our defense today. How anyone could have watched the game and then want to undermine our defensive performance is puzzling. I lost count of the number of 3-and-outs we held them to.
Plenty of other areas to critique about this game, but our defense did their best to keep us in it.
Click to expand...
For one thing, stats do not tell the whole story. Anyone who has watched the Hokies this year knows they are at best an average offense. Their best game was against Miami and they were flat out cheated by the officials of a win in that game. When I see our defense pressuring a team like Miami or UGA and sacking the quarterbacks then I will change my mind. I will give Virginia Tech this accolade. They lost 3 games by a total of 10 points Vanderbilt, Rutgers, and Miami and as noted they were robbed against Miami.
 
Techwood Relict

Techwood Relict

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,506
slugboy said:
The two interceptions are a big deal.

Also, for some reason, if we’re under 150 rushing yards, we’re in trouble.
Click to expand...
The less than 150 rushing continues to speak to our O line struggles. My eyes judgment is that we've been losing the line of scrimmage too much lately.

Losing turnover margin statistically does lead to more losses than not.
 

stinger 1957

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,528
I've only read a little over half the postings so I hope what I say has not already been posted.

During the second qt I started thinking Key would come out with Philo starting the second half, very disappointed he did not do so, as has been said it was so obvious ZP was not taking us anywhere. Beginning to see what each of our coaches are about.

Going forward I would let coach CW call plays and run the offense. Did he not do that some in '22 interim period? CBF gets tunnel vision it appears to me, could not believe on that last 4th down try he ran the ball into the middle where they had failed so much. He seems to have zero imagination. Seems so predictable. What a contrast with what the VT play caller did today. Even when we have HK it's the same few things over and over.
Seems like I rememberr him saying something about telling his HC when he was OC against GT he was going to run the ball every play, sort of telling to me about his mind set. I don't know a lot about it, just my amateur observations. Dropped balls certainly mess up a lot of things beyond the dropped balls. We make a lot of mistakes it seems to me.
 
Bogey

Bogey

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,787
stech81 said:
understand now in college football you don't need to redshirt a player that can help you.
Click to expand...
That maybe can be true if they can help you all or most of the season. It would be stupid to burn it on our last game that we have an infinitesimal chance to win.
 

cpf2001

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,388
Last year I said a few times “I don’t care that much about the ints, especially since a bunch came in chunks when we were down in the second half and he had to try to win it himself” in defense of King.

I feel vindicated now since our offense, even in the games with him, has been scaring nobody. Dink and dunk and rack up stats and chew time but then don’t score a ton of points.

We have a few weapons but we try to smush them into an uber conservative game plan.

I think there’s a reason that a lot more teams without dominant OLs go pass-happy than run-happy. We don’t have the personnel or a Paul Johnson to scheme ourselves to victory playing conservatively.

We need more options - and just more attempts/reps - through the air that aren’t screens or slow-developing deep downfield plays.
 
bobongo

bobongo

Helluva Engineer
Messages
7,750
slugboy said:
They’re “very good”

They’re one of the defensive lines that FSU was supposed to be, but wasn’t
Click to expand...
Well maybe they aren't, either (except on paper, like FSU). They came in #99 in the country against the run.

This was a tale of two sides of the line of scrimmage. The DL was stellar, and the OL was abysmal.
 
Bogey

Bogey

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,787
UgaBlows said:
That 4th and 1 when they decided to just run Jamal straight up the middle was so unimaginative and predictable
Click to expand...
Yep. We desperately needed a touchdown at that point and to run such a vanilla play that is not having much success tells me our play calling is way too conservative. Not sure if that falls on, Key or Faulkner, maybe both. We seem reluctant to be innovative in the red zone.
 
Last edited:
Top