tech_wreck47
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 8,670
What the writer of that article doesn't realize is that Richt didn't beat Tech with defense. He beat us with an offense better than our defense.
We have GT fans in this forum who translate every loss to opposition "cracking" the O.
Richt beat us with top 5 top 10 talent, not coaching.
I believe, in college football, that getting top talent is part of the coaches job description.
I think AE is on to something here; something clear to most Dwag fans: Richt is not all that hot a football coach.
My favorite example is the 2008 Dwags. That team was widely picked to win the MNC and no wonder. It was packed with pro prospects from one end to the other. Further, those prospects fit closely with what Richt and co. wanted to do on both sides of the ball. And they lost 3 games, including the one to Tech. I don't think it's any wonder that the Dwags decided he had had his run and kept coming up short, no matter what his talent level was. He's a good recruiter, but I've never thought he was all that hot a coach, especially on game day.
How he'll do at Da U is up in the air right now. He's an improvement over Golden, but that almost defines damning with faint praise. Personally I hope he settles into the mediocrity that lower recruiting will dictate.
Not sure I agree with this. The guy averaged almost 10 wins a year while he was there and we went 2-13 against him...he's a good coach, it just so happens he was in a conference with the two best coaches in college football for most of his time there (thank God).
Now I will say that the article stating that he figured our offense out is just stupid:
2008: 45 points
2009: 24 points
2010: 34 points
2011: 17 points
2012: 10 points
2013: 34 points
2014: 30 points
2015: 7 points
There's a handful of bad offensive performances in there, but we average 25 points per game against them. I'm not going to go check their D against everyone else, but I'd be willing to bet we do better than most...
That would assume that you are only measuring success in win percentage. At some point racking up wins over teams with significantly less talent than you is not going to be enough. Paul Finebaum tweeted something about Richt the other day. In this century, UGA is the only team this century in the top 10 in recruiting and in the top 10 in NFL draft picks that has not won a national title. That isn't because of luck. He doesn't have inexplicable losses every year because he is just an unlucky guy. He didn't lose to GT and not win the SEC with Stafford, Moreno, and AJ Green on the same team because he is an unlucky guy. The guy simply lacks whatever a coach needs to take their team to the next level. Like I said, it is a tough spot for fans to be in. Do you want the continued success of 9-10 win seasons pretty much every year and guaranteed good recruiting or do you want to roll the dice and take a chance on someone else who might cut out all the let down games and get you over the hump on championships? For me personally, what Richt offers would be getting old at this point.
OK, I pulled this quote from a thread from last year:
The stat on top 10 recruiting top 10 nfl drafts without nc is from cfbmatrix guy.
Look, I'm not going to sit here and defend a former Georgia coach more than I already have. I hate the guy, but he's a good coach...Urban and Saban were just better.
Be 3-1 or better, then we are a tested team ready to punch somebody in the mouth, and I think the odds shift to us.
Unlike most years, I think this year we will know what we have by the end of September.
I'd say we have a decent shot. We have Clemson at home. They haven't won at BDS in forever. If this was a Thursday nite game in Death Valley is say 1%. In ATL I'd say closer to 50/50.You seriously think we have any shot (more than 1%) at being 4-0???
If you think GT can ever get a top five recruiting class, you are sick on cool aide or something. Top Five talent in football is generally bottom five academically.I believe, in college football, that getting top talent is part of the coaches job description.
You seriously think we have any shot (more than 1%) at being 4-0???
I agree that we have a small chance against Clemson. In 2011, we caught them with their pants down and ran a #5 ranked team almost out of the stadium. That said, back to the original discussion about Ritcht I am of two minds about him. I think he is a very good coach, nice man, telegenic and an excellent recruiter. But something about him does not quite add up. He managed to lose two out of three years to Ron Zook at Florida which is just about impossible and all three years, Georgia had the superior talent. I honestly believe that Miami was very fortunate to get him. They could have ended up with a mess on their hands if he had not fallen into their laps. I will always wonder how he would of done here. He just might have been able to recruit enough good players to have been successful but we will never know.
Who else answer the poll at the end of the article?