- Messages
- 19,626
There are better methods, but it’s something. We do well on the others, too, but this is a popular serviceSo now their methodology is valid? (No, based on a lot of things including % of alumni contributing.)
Regardless, I know I couldn't get in if I had my 1974 grades and SAT.
And Vandy fell, so they aren't happy. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...r&utm_term=230919&utm_campaign=bloombergdaily
The great unwashed buy into it, so it's worth something. That doesn't mean their methodology is solid. In fact, it's not. But, that doesn't change perception. Just look at what the SEC has accomplished in football.There are better methods, but it’s something. We do well on the others, too, but this is a popular service
Yeah, but you, today, wouldn't have your 1974 grades and SAT. You'd have the same grades and SAT scores that the kids getting in today do. (or you would have gone somewhere else, had more fun, and not have PTSD 40 years later).So now their methodology is valid? (No, based on a lot of things including % of alumni contributing.)
Regardless, I know I couldn't get in if I had my 1974 grades and SAT.
And Vandy fell, so they aren't happy. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...r&utm_term=230919&utm_campaign=bloombergdaily
To add to the OP:
To add to the OP: