hwdgeplague
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 109
Nice as it has been a while. Our NCAA bid desperately needs a signature win.
Nice as it has been a while. Our NCAA bid desperately needs a signature win.
This is precisely what worries me. We need a genuine team effort on Tuesday.L'ville isn't a good matchup for us. Good guards, pressure alot. I doubt we slow them down much.
I think this is going to be MGH's first tough game i na while. they will hound him all night long. He is going to be very tired and he is already playing too many minutes.
So L ille pressures us...we have to go with three guards...they exploit their strength against our soft spot. To counter we take care of the ball get their big guys in foul trouble. Win it from the line. Agreed we will need to play our best.
Do we HAVE three guards? Let's see, there's Adam Smith.....and, well, I guess you could count Marcus...and ...who else?
Agree with the first part re: Louisville.L'ville isn't a good matchup for us. Good guards, pressure alot. I doubt we slow them down much.
I think this is going to be MGH's first tough game i na while. they will hound him all night long. He is going to be very tired and he is already playing too many minutes.
MGH is 22 years old and in the best shape of his life. And he's highly motivated right now. And he wants the minutes badly as he knows the team needs him on the floor. Until he raises his hand for a sub I leave him in to play any of the first three spots. But, I would make UL stop our inside game. For my view of this is we need to start with our strength against UL, which is getting ball inside to Chuck and Nick and pound the offensive glass. Later, when UL starts digging the post, Smith and Q and MGH will have their open shots. But that depends on our bigs making plays and getting offensive boards.Agree with the first part re: Louisville.
Disagree with too many minutes for MGH, this next game being the exception. I'll try to be fair about this knowing I don't have numbers, so I'll start by suggesting that earlier this year we wasted conservatively 4-5 possessions/game with our two traditional PGs in the game (bad shots, turnovers, ineffective sets and no ability to create, blown defensive assignments). 4-5 possessions/game and losing a myriad of games by 1-2 possessions is a big deal. Highly questionable minutes happened all the way through the game @ Clemson.
Since then, during our 4 game win streak, MGH has played no less than 38 min. And in those games he won a game on a contested drive to the basket and knocked down a couple of free throws to seal another game. In other words, he's not tired right now. So why change?
Louisville is the exception with constant ball pressure. I'd scale down MGH's minutes to 35 this game but no fewer, otherwise sub him strategically around timeouts. Back court should be a 3-way combo of Smith, MGH, and Tadric. We're not in a position to lose possessions every game with our backups. We tried that and it resulted in multiple one possession L's.
We could revert back to playing more guys and really save MGH's legs for no postseason, which is where we were headed until the recent win streak. I don't think we're playing significantly better ball the last 4 games; I've seen it more as we are playing our best players more minutes and it hasn't deteriorated their ability to produce.