- Messages
- 9,869
- Location
- Oriental, NC
What would happen if government regulators, due to ransomware payments, announced that trading in cryptocurrency was banned and blocked from internet traffic?
What would happen if government regulators, due to ransomware payments, announced that trading in cryptocurrency was banned and blocked from internet traffic?
It wouldn't stop cryptocurrency. I have a bitcoin and dogecoin wallet on my computer. I would follow the law, but if I wasn't so inclined a government ban wouldn't physically prevent me from sending or receiving bitcoin or dogecoin. Even if they were to attempt to block the internet traffic, developers would change the ports, addresses, and packets such that they weren't blocked anymore. It would be like whack-a-mole to attempt to stop it. It would look a lot like the music industry going after peer-to-peer sharing networks.What would happen if government regulators, due to ransomware payments, announced that trading in cryptocurrency was banned and blocked from internet traffic?
It wouldn't stop cryptocurrency. I have a bitcoin and dogecoin wallet on my computer. I would follow the law, but if I wasn't so inclined a government ban wouldn't physically prevent me from sending or receiving bitcoin or dogecoin. Even if they were to attempt to block the internet traffic, developers would change the ports, addresses, and packets such that they weren't blocked anymore. It would be like whack-a-mole to attempt to stop it. It would look a lot like the music industry going after peer-to-peer sharing networks.
The government could stop cryptocurrency exchanges and prevent people from converting dollars to crypto. The big problem with that would be that the government would basically be making the decision for a company that wanted to pay that they can't pay. It wouldn't stop the ransomware gangs, just further hurt the victims. Also, if a multinational company wanted to pay the fine, they could just purchase crypto in an exchange in a country that still allowed it.
Ransomware is a problem, but I don't think that crypto is necessary for it to exist. Even crypto isn't as anonymous as people believe. Crypto exchanges are completely anonymous. Once you cash out the crypto, it is extremely easy to follow. It would be a public record, in the blockchain, that your crypto was exchanged. Governments can then follow the money trail the same ways they always have. If crypto is exchanged for physical goods, then those can be tracked also. Basically, a person could use ransomware to build up a large stash of crypto, but to do anything of value with it would punch large holes in the anonymity.
I don't really look at it as a market. I look at it as an alternate payment system. The value of bitcoin would go down since people can't "trade" it. However, it could still be used to exchange bitcoin between two bitcoin addresses. Ransomware scum were using bitcoin as payment when the value was "valued" at less than $2,500. It would continue if the value goes down, even to almost nothing.The fines and criminal penalties would decimate the main portion of the market.
Well, it have to be before the tax portion of EBITDA for sureThis will be interesting to watch play out. How do you enforce a 15% income tax rate on a company that shows no profit? 15% of what? EBITDA? This seems like one of those ideas that makes sense to some on paper (not me), but then there is no way to implement it.
G-7 back steps to deter tax dodging by multinational firms
The Group of Seven wealthy democracies have agreed to support a global minimum corporate tax of at least 15% to deter multinational companies from avoiding taxes by stashing profits in low-rate countries.apnews.com
They released no technical detail on what they did. I wouldn't expect them to. I see three possibilities from the information that they have provided:Interesting story today - the feds were able to steal/recover a few million in Bitcoin from the Colonial Pipeline hackers. Makes you wonder why they’ve never used those capabilities before. Also should be a huge “oh ****” moment for hackers.
They released no technical detail on what they did. I wouldn't expect them to. I see three possibilities from the information that they have provided:
- They hacked a computer that is running the wallet that accepted the transaction, copied the wallet and moved the funds to another wallet. This matches their statements most and it matches some reports from a few weeks ago:
- The funds were moved to a crypto exchange and the US government pressured the exchange to seize the funds. Governments would be able to pressure exchanges to turn over accounts just as they can pressure banks and financial institutions to do so.
- They are overstating what they have done.
I would guess with the previous reports that DarkSide was under cyber attack that the US government conducted or orchestrated the attack and was able to gain access to their computer systems. If that is the case, then losing a few million dollars is probably not at the top of their concerns. With access to their computer systems, the government could possibly get enough information to identify them.
However it is still possible that, much like the FBI's press conference announcing a crack down on the muddy side of college basketball, they are blustering and touting without much substance.
Maybe they have. Some things are better unadvertised.Makes you wonder why they’ve never used those capabilities before.
I took a look at it. I am not sure how you decided that it doesn't require massive energy consumption. It uses the same mining process as Dogecoin. There aren't many people using it, and there aren't many people mining it. The big difference is in the difficulty level. Doge difficulty is at about 6 million. Bitcoin difficulty is at about 21 trillion. Flo is about 700. If more people start mining it, the difficulty level will increase. I ran a miner last night, but didn't get any.Got a new cryptocurrency for you - FLO:
FlourMix USD (FLO-USD) Price, Value, News & History - Yahoo Finance
Find the latest FlourMix USD (FLO-USD) price quote, history, news and other vital information to help you with your cryptocurrency trading and investing.finance.yahoo.com
Does not require massive energy consumption to generate coins.
I ain't touching it with a 10 foot pole. But I find that value proposition uniquely interesting.
I took a look at it. I am not sure how you decided that it doesn't require massive energy consumption. It uses the same mining process as Dogecoin. There aren't many people using it, and there aren't many people mining it. The big difference is in the difficulty level. Doge difficulty is at about 6 million. Bitcoin difficulty is at about 21 trillion. Flo is about 700. If more people start mining it, the difficulty level will increase. I ran a miner last night, but didn't get any.
I also couldn't find an exchange that will trade it. I am not sure how they arrive at a valuation. You can exchange Flo from wallet to wallet, but I haven't found a way to exchange it for a different crytpo or for government backed currency, unless you can find another person with a Flo wallet and make a trade with them.
I'll run the miner for a few days to see if I ever am able to get some. I am only using a PC, so odds are slim even at that low difficulty level.