SteamWhistle
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,435
- Location
- Rome, GA
There’s a HUGE difference in backing off on a kid that the old staff was just recruiting, but to pull Scholys from a commit is a damn shame!
You mean to tell me if you got accepted to Tech as a student then the school President was replaced and then you got a letter saying sorry, with change in leadership, your academic talents are no longer wanted here, you wouldn’t be pissed off?
Cause that’s what happened to these guys.
Denzel Daxon DT 6-1 315 from Fla.Temple offered King.
GT offered Denzel. Per 247.
Denzel Daxon DT 6-1 315 from Fla.
I think that quote was after he decommitted. From what I remember, they tried to show him how they could use him in the new system...maybe I am wrong. We were planning to honor the commitment.
I think that quote was after he decommitted. From what I remember, they tried to show him how they could use him in the new system...maybe I am wrong. We were planning to honor the commitment.
I look at this different. If I was a recruit and the system was changing such that I wouldn’t have a chance to play, I would want to know and have the option to go elsewhere.
Yes, I'd be pissed...when I was 18. My ego would have been bruised and my feelings hurt. However, at my age, I'd want the honest, simple and direct approach...I've gotten to the point where i don't want other people wasting my or their time. It's the KISS rule.
I think it was a mutual split with Renfree. Coach told him he wouldn't be a good fit, Sean understood and looked elsewhere. It worked out well for Sean at Duke.
Sean Renfree - "Don't want him, Dont need him."
It happens, but feel bad for kids with no other options,
AgreedWhat you wrote here makes sense, but the key word here is “option”. If a kid wants to go somewhere else where they’ll fit better, they should be allowed to. However if a kid still wants to go there and try their best to fit in the new system, they should be allowed that opportunity.