CEB
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,810
You’re right... With contracts expiring for BIG and PAC all is fair game. My bad. And of course my example is fraud and illegal... that was my point.That analogy is far different than conference alignments. What you are describing there is fraud against one group of investors.
The contract for the Pac12 is expiring mid-year 2024. UCLA and USC are NOT breaking a contract. They have announced ahead of time that they will not renew a contract with the Pac12. There is no legal agreement among the Pac12 teams after August 1, 2024. There is no legal agreement between Fox and the Pac12 after August 1, 2024. Fox can negotiate whatever agreements they desire with whoever they desire to negotiate with. They can negotiate a sweet deal with USC, UCLA, and the current Big10 and negotiate a cut-throat deal with the remaining Pac12. They have no legal commitment to the Pac12 after August 1, 2024. The Pac12 can negotiate a contract with ESPN, NBC, or Apple and cut ties with Fox.
The Big10 contract is expiring. The Pac12 contract is expiring. Their TV contracts are expiring. All parties involved are attempting to arrange the best new contract for themselves that they can. There will be winners, and there will be losers. That is extremely normal. It is not defrauding one party for another as in your analogy.
My initial comment was in the context of NBC wanting ND in the BIG and the notion that ACC teams can go to the SEC with some sort of blessing from ESPN. It can all happen in 2036 of course when contracts expire but prior to that it’s a problem.
I guess I could’ve clearly communicated and done a better job of reading too.... but that’s not what message boards are for, right?