Unfortunately they think they are.UNC money is poverty to middle class citizen to Stanford money and prestige. UNC is not in their league.
Stop spending on stupid **** and get your costs down
There are plenty of schools that want to provide access to a great education to people who aren’t those 1%-ers. Most of the time GT people (not at all saying you are one of them) crap on those schools because they aren’t rated as highly as some others and all they do is have a positive environment where they encourage kids in every way possible to earn good college degrees.I wish schools would stop wanting to be Stanford.
Give more people a great education, don't just give the richest people a 1% better "elite" education. Focus on students, not jockeying for research prestige. Stop spending on stupid **** and get your costs down (funny how this applies to academic/dorm facilities just as much as to athletics ones).
I think I could count the ones who didn’t on one hand.I suspect most of us who went to GT encountered more than one professor who cared more about their current and future research grants than educating their students.
I think I could count the ones who didn’t on one hand.
I didn’t and still don’t think GT is a good place to learn, but it has a long-standing reputation for high standards and so it just feeds itself since employers go there to hire and so you gotta play the game if you’re looking for a good job.
Though I think not washing out nearly as many of the admitted students is a big improvement.
But now that I’m in the hiring seat, I generally find folks from places like the UCSDs of the world to be every bit as capable but without as frequently having a weird Shaft-induced combination of ego+self-doubt. (Not that the UCs don’t play the research game, but the ones down the ladder a bit from Cal tend to be less … intense … about it.)
Just before ugaI can see the ACC 24-25 schedule for Georgia Tech featuring three consecutive away games at Stanford, followed by SMU, followed by California.
Followed by the 1st round of the playoffs…Just before uga
The flip side of this is what has happened to the overall academic environment at uga. Students are less and less interested in stretching themselves or being challenged in the classroom. They live for football season and professors are encouraged to go light on students during the season. Grade inflation has become a necessary step to keep the whole enterprise going.I think I could count the ones who didn’t on one hand.
I didn’t and still don’t think GT is a good place to learn, but it has a long-standing reputation for high standards and so it just feeds itself since employers go there to hire and so you gotta play the game if you’re looking for a good job.
Though I think not washing out nearly as many of the admitted students is a big improvement.
But now that I’m in the hiring seat, I generally find folks from places like the UCSDs of the world to be every bit as capable but without as frequently having a weird Shaft-induced combination of ego+self-doubt. (Not that the UCs don’t play the research game, but the ones down the ladder a bit from Cal tend to be less … intense … about it.)
I’m not sure I agree with this. This is a good description of the state of UGA prior to Jan Kemp. I’m not entirely on board that this is accurate today.The flip side of this is what has happened to the overall academic environment at uga. Students are less and less interested in stretching themselves or being challenged in the classroom. They live for football season and professors are encouraged to go light on students during the season. Grade inflation has become a necessary step to keep the whole enterprise going.
Are there serious students at uga? Yes. Are there people who graduate from uga and make a difference in the world? Yes. But this is in spite of the prevailing culture at uga not because of. Nothing at uga says academic excellence right now, except for their smoke and mirrors approach to everything “wonderful” about uga land.
I have connections at uga. Just reporting what they say.I’m not sure I agree with this. This is a good description of the state of UGA prior to Jan Kemp. I’m not entirely on board that this is accurate today.
I don't doubt what they say. It's still very different than 1980 when they cheated their way to the natty.I have connections at uga. Just reporting what they say.
I left after three straight semesters of 3.5+ GPA. But I was young and pissed off and tired of fighting the school administration, so after proving to myself that I could get a bunch of A's after a rough start, I didn't care to stay.Well, sounds like you had a real rough time at GT - so bad that you can't find anything decent to say for it. Did you flunk out by chance?
Recent statement by our current president to several alums this summer. GT was easier to get into back then, but harder to get out of. It's harder to get in now, but easier to get out.I’m not sure I agree with this. This is a good description of the state of UGA prior to Jan Kemp. I’m not entirely on board that this is accurate today.
"Retention" always seemed an odd and bogus yardstick of academic measurement to me. If anything, it should be the other way around.Recent statement by our current president to several alums this summer. GT was easier to get into back then, but harder to get out of. It's harder to get in now, but easier to get out.
Retention is one of the key metrics on college rankings. We didn't do well in that category back in the day.
Yes. It’s different now. This is more “passive” cheating.I don't doubt what they say. It's still very different than 1980 when they cheated their way to the natty.