I am conflicted with these games. I like for the SEC teams to lose to give credibility to the ACC but I am disgusted by the 7 members who met to break up the ACC and that included UNC. I now will pull against FSU regardless of who they play. I enjoy us beating UNC since I live in Chapel Hill.Go LSU and South Carolina I hope FSU and UNC lose big not just big but real big.
The rumor is that NCst was the deciding/changed voteAll the talk about incentives for FSU and Clemson gave reason to think that might have changed their vote. If they still voted NO, then the conference ought to return to even distribution and let FSU bolt whenever they can raise the money.
I agree, i wholeheartedly hate the sec and their idiotic fanbases, but will def pull for them vs. FSU, Clem, and UNC. I can’t wait for them to leave the glorious All Coast Conference and enrichen the rest of us with their idiocy.I am conflicted with these games. I like for the SEC teams to lose to give credibility to the ACC but I am disgusted by the 7 members who met to break up the ACC and that included UNC. I now will pull against FSU regardless of who they play. I enjoy us beating UNC since I live in Chapel Hill.
I'll pull for Clemson, they may have voted no but otherwise kept their mouths shut. It's the other two I'd love to watch lose.I agree, i wholeheartedly hate the sec and their idiotic fanbases, but will def pull for them vs. FSU, Clem, and UNC. I can’t wait for them to leave the glorious All Coast Conference and enrichen the rest of us with their idiocy.
They want the same thing, they are just cowardly letting fsu take all the heatI'll pull for Clemson, they may have voted no but otherwise kept their mouths shut. It's the other two I'd love to watch lose.
Why does Stanford have fake classes like UNC ? Happy for these 3 new schools, one day we may need helpUNC prob views Stanford as a West-coast version of themselves and do not want their competition in the conference that they created, own, and want out of (wtf?)
I don’t think so. Clemson may want out, but FSU seems intent to set fire to it all on the way out the door.They want the same thing, they are just cowardly letting fsu take all the heat
+1All the talk about incentives for FSU and Clemson gave reason to think that might have changed their vote. If they still voted NO, then the conference ought to return to even distribution and let FSU bolt whenever they can raise the money.
Yes, this is the answer. The ACC is a national conference now with some of the best athletic brands and best academic institutions in college football. We need to behave like it. The B1G may have a larger set of TV contracts right now, but when you measure athletic and academic success, the ACC competes quite well.I think this is great, I think the ACC can't look at becoming part of the Big 2, it needs to focus on staying 3, our enemy is not the Big 10 or the SEC, its the Big 12.
I wish we could have gone big, and invited West VA, Okie State, and tried the 4 corners before they were snatched up by the Big 12.
Don't let the door hit you FSU on the way out!
Will the Alumni association allow the gtaa to use their alumni list for benefit of gtaa? Seems like all hands on deck is an obvious next stepDallas and San Francisco are going to make great away trips. We have such a huge alumni presence in San Francisco and the support for both those programs is so poor that we might take over their stadiums.
All the talk about incentives for FSU and Clemson gave reason to think that might have changed their vote. If they still voted NO, then the conference ought to return to even distribution and let FSU bolt whenever they can raise the money.