CDS Expectations

[dtm1997]

Might be a good idea to avoid setting expectations until we see who's on the team.

 

[Techwood Relict]

Our expectations aren't unreasonable, are they?

Go Jackets!

 

[Northeast Stinger]

Might be a good idea to avoid setting expectations until we see who's on the team.

Killjoy

 

[ESPNjacket]

Might be a good idea to avoid setting expectations until we see who's on the team.

Crazy talk! ACC championship right away or its clear failure!

 

[lv20gt]

Might be a good idea to avoid setting expectations until we see who's on the team.

But wouldn't that be a part of the expectations? I would expect him to be able to keep the team together and take some advantage of the portal. Seems that was a major reason why he was hired as opposed to coaches we'd have to wait until they were out of the NCAAT to get.

 

[ChicagobasedJacket]

The NCAA is trying to get help from Congress

The NCAA's top priority for 2023: Get help from Congress

No one ever said it’d be easy to work with Congress. But it may be the only way forward, NCAA leaders believe.

theathletic.com

House committee to hold public hearing on NIL

The House Energy and Commerce Committee will host a hearing March 29 to discuss the NIL rights of college athletes, as new NCAA president Charlie Baker takes over.

www.espn.com

As Americans fill out their March Madness brackets, lawmakers are bringing back efforts to strengthen NIL protections for college athletes.

News and analysis from Capitol Hill for when you only have a few minutes, from POLITICO.

www.politico.com

And the NCAA will lose at the Supreme Court yet again if they try to cap NCAA. Congress isn’t going to pass any cap on NIL. Why? What politician have you ever heard say “I want my constituents to make less money” - raising taxes is different from capping and/or lowering income.

 

[slugboy]

And the NCAA will lose at the Supreme Court yet again if they try to cap NCAA. Congress isn’t going to pass any cap on NIL. Why? What politician have you ever heard say “I want my constituents to make less money” - raising taxes is different from capping and/or lowering income.

The NFL and MLB both have anti-trust exemptions from the Supreme Court or from Congress that let them do some price or salary fixing.

Baseball’s exemption is from the Supreme Court and the NFL’s is from Congress. There’s precedence, and if the NCAA asks for something reasonable, they could get support.

That’s not the case the NCAA lost. The NCAA lost a case about AMATEURISM, and whether they could both pay athletes nothing and prevent athletes from taking outside income.

The NCAA was doing both of those without any Congressional or Supreme Court support. They’d been warned that they had a really weak case.

Schools could pay wages to the athletes and prohibit or limit secondary income. Most job contracts do something similar.

As unpopular as the NCAA is, the member schools are popular, and the bidding war for athletes isn’t. If Senators from South Carolina and Missouri don’t think their teams can keep up with Alabama, why wouldn’t they want to level the playing field?

What is MLB's antitrust exemption? Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley using baseball's century-old golden goose as political cudgel

MLB’s exemption resulted from a 1922 Supreme Court ruling that stated that the business of baseball did not constitute “interstate commerce."

www.usatoday.com

 

[slugboy]

I saw this, and one of the things I want from Stoudamire is to teach our guards and wings and bigs to make the kinds of reads that Kobe is talking about here

 

[Novajacket]

Straight from CDS https://www.championshipproductions...lding-a-Perimeter-Player-2-Pack_BD-05131.html