- Messages
- 19,554
Kelly was asked who is simulating JT this week in the last question of this clip. Realistic response.
Does this equate to 2 guys spying JT? If so, their defense may be in trouble. It seems like Tulane had a similar strategy of keeping JT and the B-Back contained, but his quick reads made us impossible to stop.Interesting quote: " We have someone overlapping the person assigned to the QB" in case that person can't get to him.
Wouldn't having 2 guys on JT leave the perimeter wide open?
So then play action could be a good call?I doubt it. I'm guessing that he's talking about a DB who has secondary QB responsibility once it's clear that it's not a pass or something like that.
Also, not the best idea because we try to account for all defenders with blockers. If you have a secondary player focusing on JT he's liable to get cracked real hard (think of Prewitt in Ole Miss game) and leave a big opening.I doubt it. I'm guessing that he's talking about a DB who has secondary QB responsibility once it's clear that it's not a pass or something like that.
Unless they're playing 12 guys on D, then putting 2 on JT opens up either a receiver or a back to run free. If that is, in fact, what he meant.Does this equate to 2 guys spying JT? If so, their defense may be in trouble. It seems like Tulane had a similar strategy of keeping JT and the B-Back contained, but his quick reads made us impossible to stop.
Seems to me that the QB now will occupy two defenders rather than the traditional one. Strange and it has to weaken the defense somewhere.If 2 defenders have overlapping responsibility of covering JT, it really sounds like they want to force us to pass, which may not help them any.
Enough pre-game talk! Let's go! To Hell with Rudy!
So then play action could be a good call?