Techwood Relict
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,394
Makes one curious what the reason is, no?Not a good look when your best RB rides the pine for seemingly no reason. Mason scenario 2.0
Makes one curious what the reason is, no?Not a good look when your best RB rides the pine for seemingly no reason. Mason scenario 2.0
We all say blame the coach, players aren't amped at home, hire a new coach etc. One question: why, with 9 minutes of game time left and we go down 8, is there all of a sudden a mad rush to the exits? If we want our guys in white and gold play all of 4 quarters, we need to support them FOR ALL 4 QUARTERS.
Not a good look when your best RB rides the pine for seemingly no reason. Mason scenario 2.0
Most of us have been curious about it. Haynes and Cooley are good in their way, but you need someone in the backfield who can run over people. Dontae can do that. Two little scatbacks are one too many.Makes one curious what the reason is, no?
this is why it takes most new coaches 2 to 3 years to build their program anytime a new coach comes in you have to clean up those who are a problem....another thought to echo Key's post-game comments on the radio...it's time to have some tough conversations with players and get some bad attitudes out the door.
Haynes hits the hole with authority and makes yards where other cannot. He’s got good vision. Cooley always cuts the wrong way or runs into our OL. He’s great in space, but unless he has a clear hole to run thru he’s pretty much like any other back we have on the bench.Most of us have been curious about it. Haynes and Cooley are good in their way, but you need someone in the backfield who can run over people. Dontae can do that. Two little scatbacks are one too many.
The one time he got the ball yesterday he ran over two people, which are two more than Cooley and Haynes ran over all day.
Seems fair.So I've thought on this quite a bit...and maybe Key just needs more time, but early indications aren't great. Fans often refer to "coaching" as one thing, but really it's a several different things: fundamentals, game prep/strategy, execution, in-game adjustments.
I think the one area that Key has definitely improved upon is fundamentals. We've generally gotten better at blocking and tackling. We aren't great, but we are better. Game prep/strategy on offense looks miles ahead of where we have been.
Execution continues to be a serious issue. Our staff just doesn't seem to mesh well on game day. How can we have multiple plays where we have 9-10 guys on the field? How can we burn a time out on 4th and 8 to punt when a delay of game would have actually helped us? How can we let half the clock run off at the end of a half with 50+ seconds and two time outs?
In-game adjustments - I don't know. To my untrained eye it sure seems like we take a long time to see opportunity. For weeks I've felt like the read options have given us a chance for big plays, but we use them sparingly and King has a tendency to give more than keep. Yesterday we finally busted a few big plays. Seems like we could have gone this route earlier.
Bottom line is we just are not very good. We've won eight games at Bobby Dodd in 4.5 years. Only four of those were ACC games. We will not be favored in another home game this year. Hiring Key felt like a settle at the time and IMO he should have a relatively short leash. Changing directions after a year would be foolish, but it really feels like the wheels are coming off and we're going to finish with 3-4 wins again. If we repeat this trend next year with the same look and feel I don't know how we could stick with him. My hope is that the team responds with 2 more wins and looks competitive in the other games. Then that at least gives you something to build on.
...another thought to echo Key's post-game comments on the radio...it's time to have some tough conversations with players and get some bad attitudes out the door.
I think we just need to relax.So I've thought on this quite a bit...and maybe Key just needs more time, but early indications aren't great. Fans often refer to "coaching" as one thing, but really it's a several different things: fundamentals, game prep/strategy, execution, in-game adjustments.
I think the one area that Key has definitely improved upon is fundamentals. We've generally gotten better at blocking and tackling. We aren't great, but we are better. Game prep/strategy on offense looks miles ahead of where we have been.
Execution continues to be a serious issue. Our staff just doesn't seem to mesh well on game day. How can we have multiple plays where we have 9-10 guys on the field? How can we burn a time out on 4th and 8 to punt when a delay of game would have actually helped us? How can we let half the clock run off at the end of a half with 50+ seconds and two time outs?
In-game adjustments - I don't know. To my untrained eye it sure seems like we take a long time to see opportunity. For weeks I've felt like the read options have given us a chance for big plays, but we use them sparingly and King has a tendency to give more than keep. Yesterday we finally busted a few big plays. Seems like we could have gone this route earlier.
Bottom line is we just are not very good. We've won eight games at Bobby Dodd in 4.5 years. Only four of those were ACC games. We will not be favored in another home game this year. Hiring Key felt like a settle at the time and IMO he should have a relatively short leash. Changing directions after a year would be foolish, but it really feels like the wheels are coming off and we're going to finish with 3-4 wins again. If we repeat this trend next year with the same look and feel I don't know how we could stick with him. My hope is that the team responds with 2 more wins and looks competitive in the other games. Then that at least gives you something to build on.
...another thought to echo Key's post-game comments on the radio...it's time to have some tough conversations with players and get some bad attitudes out the door.
I agree with you on several of these issue's, particularly game prep and in-game adjustments. The positives for me is that Key is a football guy, he's played the game and he is no non-sense. He is a first time coach in his first year coaching and these things can be fixed with more coaching experience. And, I also support your last statement !So I've thought on this quite a bit...and maybe Key just needs more time, but early indications aren't great. Fans often refer to "coaching" as one thing, but really it's a several different things: fundamentals, game prep/strategy, execution, in-game adjustments.
I think the one area that Key has definitely improved upon is fundamentals. We've generally gotten better at blocking and tackling. We aren't great, but we are better. Game prep/strategy on offense looks miles ahead of where we have been.
Execution continues to be a serious issue. Our staff just doesn't seem to mesh well on game day. How can we have multiple plays where we have 9-10 guys on the field? How can we burn a time out on 4th and 8 to punt when a delay of game would have actually helped us? How can we let half the clock run off at the end of a half with 50+ seconds and two time outs?
In-game adjustments - I don't know. To my untrained eye it sure seems like we take a long time to see opportunity. For weeks I've felt like the read options have given us a chance for big plays, but we use them sparingly and King has a tendency to give more than keep. Yesterday we finally busted a few big plays. Seems like we could have gone this route earlier.
Bottom line is we just are not very good. We've won eight games at Bobby Dodd in 4.5 years. Only four of those were ACC games. We will not be favored in another home game this year. Hiring Key felt like a settle at the time and IMO he should have a relatively short leash. Changing directions after a year would be foolish, but it really feels like the wheels are coming off and we're going to finish with 3-4 wins again. If we repeat this trend next year with the same look and feel I don't know how we could stick with him. My hope is that the team responds with 2 more wins and looks competitive in the other games. Then that at least gives you something to build on.
...another thought to echo Key's post-game comments on the radio...it's time to have some tough conversations with players and get some bad attitudes out the door.
This is true the NCAA messed up college football with the transfer portal and NILI think we just need to relax.
Auburn, which recruits (arguably) better, has more resources and a university commitment to athletics is also 3-4. It takes time.
One player told me at camp, nobody knew another player. Nobody. “Who are you? What position do you play?”
Coaches have an idea of how they want to compete. Perhaps they don’t have the players. Or the skills. Or the development. This isn’t Football 1985.
It’s never as good, or as bad, as it seems.
Can’t emphasize enough that we have a rookie coach who will continue to grow. I have no doubt he is a hard worker and a student of the game.I agree with you on several of these issue's, particularly game prep and in-game adjustments. The positives for me is that Key is a football guy, he's played the game and he is no non-sense. He is a first time coach in his first year coaching and these things can be fixed with more coaching experience. And, I also support your last statement !
He will need to make some hard decisions after the season with players and assistant coaches be them friends or not.Can’t emphasize enough that we have a rookie coach who will continue to grow. I have no doubt he is a hard worker and a student of the game.
The NCAA is a joke or at least has been, but someone needs to put a salary cap for each teams NIL organization. Or the NIL will continue to create a bigger divide between the semi-pro teams like the one 60 miles east of us and regular college football teams ...This is true the NCAA messed up college football with the transfer portal and NIL
I think, unlike Collins who had to be forced into that, he is fully capable of doing that.He will need to make some hard decisions after the season with players and assistant coaches be them friends or not.
One of the things I used to enjoy about the old coaches (Bear Bryant, Dodd, Bo), is how simple their game plans were. Bear’s were often on one side of a piece of paper.We seem to have a pattern, in the games we've lost, that when we're more than 1 score behind and we press hard to move the ball, we toss INTs about 50%, or more, of the time. That's probably not terribly profound, but it is important. You have to be able to play under control when you're behind (especially with a D as bad as ours). That aspect seems to be one of maturity, and King just needs to make better decisions. Young, uber-talented guys often tend to do this. He has to learn not to do it, to play within himself, march the team downfield, and put points up. Just a couple of thoughts on why games keep ending up with teams pulling away in the 4th.
Very well said! Except you forgot Coach Prime.One of the things I used to enjoy about the old coaches (Bear Bryant, Dodd, Bo), is how simple their game plans were. Bear’s were often on one side of a piece of paper.
The stats are that your likelihood of scoring is proportional to your starting field position. Get the ball on your own ten yard line and the likelihood of scoring is ten percent. Bear’s entire game plan was ”get to midfield”. He loved a good punt … start at the twenty, get 15 yards, punt? Dammit, ok. Longest time play in the game (7-8 second), so you get good TOP and the odds are back in your favor. Stop them, change possessions and you’re at midfield and didn’t make a mistake. He won the SEC at Kentucky running six plays on offense.
Dodd said the same. Keep the game close, win it in the fourth. Always go for an TD if inside the ten. (His stats shows GT was 50% likely to score, so 7 beats six, all day long.)
Bill P said his entire game was turnover ratio and hidden yardage. Very difficult to lose if you are +2 in turnovers and have more than 100 yds in hidden yardage. CPJ famously once said he didn’t care about defense. Just score 28 points and win TOP and it’s a W, statistically speaking.
I don’t hear that from anyone in todays game. Very few. It’s more about NIL and the portal.