BurdellJacket
Ramblin' Wreck
- Messages
- 510
- Location
- Atlanta
Piss on him and yes uga, 8 wins next year. And if I was uga I wouldn't over look us.
Well I'll just 2nd, 3rd and 4th that @stech81 !!! Well done!
Piss on him and yes uga, 8 wins next year. And if I was uga I wouldn't over look us.
Dont get the hate for Virginia Tech, they are my personal favorite to win the coastal this year. They lost almost every important starter on defense heading into last year, and are now a much older team. ~18 total returning starters isn't something to scoff at, especially 11 that started at one point on defense.
What I said - it completely ignores history. When CPJ was hired, it was going to be a transition year (oops). Same thing before. We've changed head coaches and offensive/defensive schemes SEVERAL times, not just once, over the last 25 years. And yet, we have 1 single year under 0.500 in ACC play in the last 25 years. Not 1 single other ACC school can say that.
I mean sure, we could win only 4 games. But based on the last 25 years, we have a 7x higher chance of winning the Coastal Division than of winning only 4 games.
Remember last year? Pre-season we were predicted to finish like 11th in the ACC. Same bull**** - we never finish there. And where did we finish? 4th. Happens every year. Idiots.
Please post immediately if anyone sees and O/U at 4 or less. I’m wanting to buy a bunch of toys and could use the extra cash.I hope Vegas agrees with him and gives us an O/U of 4. If so, I’ll either be winning or losing a lot of money at season’s end.
CPJ also inherited a defense that had an entire DL that was drafted. That DL was a highly ranked unit before CPJ even stepped on campus. All the DBs eventually were either drafted or spent multiple years in the NFL.
There were 2 future NFL OLs (Cord Howard, Andrew Gardner), a future 1st round WR, a 2 time all ACC RB (though argument can be made CPJ's system helped with that) that was drafted and played multiple years in the NFL.
Transition year, YES, but there was still high level talent.
CGC has, IMO, a very talented (but young) defensive backfield, but the front 7 is a huge question mark. Offensively, who would you consider on the caliber of Gardner and Howard on the OL? Dwyer at RB? Demaryius at WR?
I get that GT has often been overlooked, but with a talent level that doesn't match the 2008 team that CPJ had, and new coaches and systems on both sides, I can see where Connolly is coming from. Anyone being objective and fair can relate to what he's saying.
Now, as a GT fan, and knowing how the Coastal is ripe for the taking, if GT does not win at least 6 games I'd be disappointed.
That's why they play the games. We'll see.
CPJ also inherited a defense that had an entire DL that was drafted. That DL was a highly ranked unit before CPJ even stepped on campus. All the DBs eventually were either drafted or spent multiple years in the NFL.
There were 2 future NFL OLs (Cord Howard, Andrew Gardner), a future 1st round WR, a 2 time all ACC RB (though argument can be made CPJ's system helped with that) that was drafted and played multiple years in the NFL.
Transition year, YES, but there was still high level talent.
CGC has, IMO, a very talented (but young) defensive backfield, but the front 7 is a huge question mark. Offensively, who would you consider on the caliber of Gardner and Howard on the OL? Dwyer at RB? Demaryius at WR?
I get that GT has often been overlooked, but with a talent level that doesn't match the 2008 team that CPJ had, and new coaches and systems on both sides, I can see where Connolly is coming from. Anyone being objective and fair can relate to what he's saying.
Now, as a GT fan, and knowing how the Coastal is ripe for the taking, if GT does not win at least 6 games I'd be disappointed.
That's why they play the games. We'll see.
I didn't think it was an outrageous prediction. I enjoyed the data presented. I think we are more like a 6-7 win team, but 4 is not out of the question.
If I was CGC I’d post this on my wall. They must not think very much of him or his coaching staff to puke on our team like that. CGC must be smoking if he read that projection.32 percent chance of beating Temple? Lordy.
VT started 11 people for the first time on defense alone last year, more than literally every other team in the nation. Portal hit them on offense, not defense, and they still return over 50% of their starters, and the most returning production of literally everyone in the ACC. They got demolished by injuries last year, and should be better for that reason alone. They had 5 DBs out for multiple games, which was the bigger issue with chemistry. Playing with different people every week does that. UVA is obviously a favorite as well, but IMO VT also has the pieces in play to make a run. They arguably had the youngest and least experienced team last year, and can only get better, especially on defense.They lost a lot of players to the portal, and had chemistry issues last year. They haven't gotten the same level of DB play there on defense basically since their DB coach left and they ran out of Fullers. This made their defense a lot more limited. Their QB is quite streaky.
I think we finish the cycle in the Coastal with UVa winning it this year, assuming Bryce Perkins stays healthy. Bronco will have them solid on D.
CPJ also inherited a defense that had an entire DL that was drafted. That DL was a highly ranked unit before CPJ even stepped on campus. All the DBs eventually were either drafted or spent multiple years in the NFL.
There were 2 future NFL OLs (Cord Howard, Andrew Gardner), a future 1st round WR, a 2 time all ACC RB (though argument can be made CPJ's system helped with that) that was drafted and played multiple years in the NFL.
Transition year, YES, but there was still high level talent.
CGC has, IMO, a very talented (but young) defensive backfield, but the front 7 is a huge question mark. Offensively, who would you consider on the caliber of Gardner and Howard on the OL? Dwyer at RB? Demaryius at WR?
I get that GT has often been overlooked, but with a talent level that doesn't match the 2008 team that CPJ had, and new coaches and systems on both sides, I can see where Connolly is coming from. Anyone being objective and fair can relate to what he's saying.
Now, as a GT fan, and knowing how the Coastal is ripe for the taking, if GT does not win at least 6 games I'd be disappointed.
That's why they play the games. We'll see.
He's not using his gut, he's using a formula that he's developed over a decade, and it tests very well against others. He does not care so much about our history, but he's looking at every single season by ANY FBS team since about 2007 when he started doing this. GT might be special, but we probably aren't, so we're probably going to look pretty similar to other teams that match our profile of returning production and talent coming in. That profile, against our schedule, projects us (and any team that looks like us) to go 4-8 on average.Another idiot predicts our worst year in the last 25 years. Despite having been through several different coaches and offensive/defensive schemes before without having bad seasons, somehow this season will just be different. Despite all the historical data contradicting him, he just knows in his gut that he's right. Despite the fact people predict horse **** like this every year on us and they're wrong, he just knows in his gut that he's going to be right. Idiots.
If I was CGC I’d post this on my wall. They must not think very much of him or his coaching staff to puke on our team like that. CGC must be smoking if he read that projection.
If we don’t steamroll Temple now, I won’t really know what to make of the character of our team and staff.
I’ll reaffirm my 8 win prediction. We’re running an easier offense with a better QB, the defense will be coached better. That’s good enough for 2-3 extra wins right there.
I agree and disagree. We sucked 2 years ago because half of the team (exaggeration alert) was injured. We didn't suck 2 years ago, we didn't get to play a full schedule. We lost 3 games by a total of 6 points. We had more offense (by far in some cases) than half the teams we lost to, LOL. We were a 0.500 team with half our losses by 1 point. If he predicted a 6-6 season or something, I'd yawn and say he's probably on the right track. But he's not predicting 6 or 7 wins, he's predicting 4 wins. We haven't had 4 wins or less but once in 25 years.
He's not using his gut, he's using a formula that he's developed over a decade, and it tests very well against others. He does not care so much about our history, but he's looking at every single season by ANY FBS team since about 2007 when he started doing this. GT might be special, but we probably aren't, so we're probably going to look pretty similar to other teams that match our profile of returning production and talent coming in. That profile, against our schedule, projects us (and any team that looks like us) to go 4-8 on average.
Right, we could win only 4 games. We could also win 10. In the last 25 years, we've won 10 or more games 3x as often than we've won 4 or fewer games. We've won 9 or more games 7x as often as we've won 4 or fewer games. So why does everyone always predict the low end option?
Probability doesn't work the way you think it does. The fact that we have won 9 or more games 7x as often we've won 4 or fewer is irrelevant.