Good read and I think he is a very smart coach, don't want to get my hopes up I feel Louisville will get him. Not sure were they get all their money .Here’s an interesting article on Scott Satterfield’s “confuse and clobber” offensive philosophy at Appalachian State:
https://www.footballstudyhall.com/2...-lsu-nc-state-appalachian-state-college-style
Too bad we haven’t even contacted him and he already has interview with Louisville tomorrow
Too bad we haven’t even contacted him and he already has interview with Louisville tomorrow
But you would think we would have at least made contact but nope.It ain’t over ‘til it’s over.
But you would think we would have at least made contact but nope.
Don’t overlook the possibility that Nate Woody and Scott Satterfield have been in touch with each other all along.
Are Whiz and CAM the only ones that have been “contacted “?Too bad we haven’t even contacted him and he already has interview with Louisville tomorrow
Just wait until the L’ville meltdown when they can’t bag Satterfield.Too bad we haven’t even contacted him and he already has interview with Louisville tomorrow
And let's hope that conversation wasn't about Woody going to LouisvilleDon’t overlook the possibility that Nate Woody and Scott Satterfield have been in touch with each other all along.
Can someone explain this reasoning to me? I don’t want Ken Whisenhunt, either, but don’t the heavy donors have a greater vested interest in this? I can’t seem to follow the thinking that gets you from pacifying donors to making a bad decision.I have a bad feeling we are passifying the donors with our interview choices and that is going to lead to bottom fishing. Maybe Scott has no interest in coming here, I have no idea, but I think his offense is the best fit for the players we can get.
There are several vacancies around the country, so if you interview people you don’t want to hire to passify donors then you are wasting time that could be spent with your top candidate. And that candidate may end up elsewhere. It is the same principle in recruiting talent for teams in workplace. I hope I am wrong and TStan has a better grip on this than it appears. CKW could be his top candidate in which case that is where he is spending his time. I have no inside knowledge, but I have built a lot of teams over the years. I can tell you that wasting time with candidates you don’t want is a huge mistake.Can someone explain this reasoning to me? I don’t want Ken Whisenhunt, either, but don’t the heavy donors have a greater vested interest in this? I can’t seem to follow the thinking that gets you from pacifying donors to making a bad decision.
You know this to be fact? How?But you would think we would have at least made contact but nope.
Andy's wife and Woody's wife travel together to away games. Andy may have been on hot seat for championing J Thomas early in season and for the less than stellar play of MLB. I know he was not pleased the defense struggled so badly in pass pro.Too bad we haven’t even contacted him and he already has interview with Louisville tomorrow