Analytics post mortem

inknerd

Georgia Tech Fan
Messages
35
Post week 1 QBRs (not opponent adjusted) from https://www.espn.com/college-football/qbr/_/group/1

Kyle McCord put up numbers against Ohio



RKNAMEQBRPAAPLAYSEPAPASSRUNSACKPENRAW
1Cam Ward
MIA
95.712.24011.18.32.1-0.21.096.0
2
Tyler Shough
LOU
83.36.8255.15.30.0-0.20.094.5
3
Kyle McCord
SYR
82.18.4459.310.6-0.5-0.7-0.187.4
4
Anthony Colandrea
UVA
77.88.6366.05.91.2-1.20.092.3
5
DJ Uiagalelei
FSU
77.74.9356.67.2-0.2-0.70.381.1
6
Haynes King
GT
76.56.9698.78.70.40.0-0.573.9
7
Hank Bachmeier
WAKE
64.05.7335.15.40.6-0.7-0.285.9
8
Preston Stone
SMU
60.24.4505.74.61.50.0-0.271.4
9
Fernando Mendoza
CAL
59.33.9254.64.80.5-0.6-0.183.3
10
Kyron Drones
VT
58.10.8523.05.4-1.0-1.2-0.353.8
11
Eli Holstein
PITT
54.65.0475.76.31.1-1.6-0.175.3
12
Grayson McCall
NCSU
48.85.4477.68.2-0.1-0.70.276.6
13
Cade Klubnik
CLEM
40.8-4.937-2.1-0.1-1.3-0.70.020.2
14
Max Johnson
UNC
37.0-2.628-1.2-2.92.2-1.00.527.6
15
Maalik Murphy
DUKE
34.22.3423.23.10.00.00.164.0
16
Ashton Daniels
STAN
12.5-11.554-8.3-4.2-2.1-2.90.99.8
DJU over King and Klubnik over Murphy... I'll have a double of whatever they're drinking.
 

GT33

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,266
DJU over King and Klubnik over Murphy... I'll have a double of whatever they're drinking.
They factored in tonight's results. No way the ACC is letting fsu lose 2 in a row. Sucks to be BC because they're gonna get completely hosed all night.
 

roadkill

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,921
Post week 1 QBRs (not opponent adjusted)** from https://www.espn.com/college-football/qbr/_/group/1

Kyle McCord put up numbers against Ohio



RKNAMEQBRPAAPLAYSEPAPASSRUNSACKPENRAW
1Cam Ward
MIA
95.712.24011.18.32.1-0.21.096.0
2
Tyler Shough
LOU
83.36.8255.15.30.0-0.20.094.5
3
Kyle McCord
SYR
82.18.4459.310.6-0.5-0.7-0.187.4
4
Anthony Colandrea
UVA
77.88.6366.05.91.2-1.20.092.3
5
DJ Uiagalelei
FSU
77.74.9356.67.2-0.2-0.70.381.1
6
Haynes King
GT
76.56.9698.78.70.40.0-0.573.9
7
Hank Bachmeier
WAKE
64.05.7335.15.40.6-0.7-0.285.9
8
Preston Stone
SMU
60.24.4505.74.61.50.0-0.271.4
9
Fernando Mendoza
CAL
59.33.9254.64.80.5-0.6-0.183.3
10
Kyron Drones
VT
58.10.8523.05.4-1.0-1.2-0.353.8
11
Eli Holstein
PITT
54.65.0475.76.31.1-1.6-0.175.3
12
Grayson McCall
NCSU
48.85.4477.68.2-0.1-0.70.276.6
13
Cade Klubnik
CLEM
40.8-4.937-2.1-0.1-1.3-0.70.020.2
14
Max Johnson
UNC
37.0-2.628-1.2-2.92.2-1.00.527.6
15
Maalik Murphy
DUKE
34.22.3423.23.10.00.00.164.0
16
Ashton Daniels
STAN
12.5-11.554-8.3-4.2-2.1-2.90.99.8


** (edit) doh! It is opponent adjusted
Kinda hard to get a good bead on Strength of Opponent Defenses only one game in, wouldn't you think? All that to say I'm taking adjusted QBR with a grain of salt.
 

slugboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
11,724
Kinda hard to get a good bead on Strength of Opponent Defenses only one game in, wouldn't you think? All that to say I'm taking adjusted QBR with a grain of salt.
Yeah, that’s based mostly on last year’s defenses.

Funny thing is, Ohio’s defense was a lot higher ranked than our defense last season.

Here’s the bias-free Colley matrix after week 0–we’re #1!!!


(Come back after 5 weeks for that one, too)
 

roadkill

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,921
Yeah, that’s based mostly on last year’s defenses.

Funny thing is, Ohio’s defense was a lot higher ranked than our defense last season.

Here’s the bias-free Colley matrix after week 0–we’re #1!!!


(Come back after 5 weeks for that one, too)
Haha, I recently checked Colley's and saw that. Started to post the link but saw it doesn't have week 1 games factored in.
 

roadkill

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,921

Takeaways:
- UNC should have lost, and would have if the Minn. kicker could make chip-shot field goals.
- Clem played uga closer than the final score indicates. (surprising, but I only saw a little bit of their game).
- VT was lucky to make it to overtime.
- The discrepancy between our net success rate margin and the final score is likely due to our successful goal-line stands.
 

slugboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
11,724
Takeaways:
- UNC should have lost, and would have if the Minn. kicker could make chip-shot field goals.
- Clem played uga closer than the final score indicates. (surprising, but I only saw a little bit of their game).
- VT was lucky to make it to overtime.
- The discrepancy between our net success rate margin and the final score is likely due to our successful goal-line stands.
Yup.

It’s based on net success rate. Letting the other team repeatedly drive to the 1 yard line usually loses you a lot of games.

I’m both happy we were tough in the red zone and would rather they never saw the red zone.

UGA had a lot of big plays (and we had a few).

Miami was a big beatdown of an SEC team.
 

LongforDodd

LatinxBreakfastTacos
Messages
3,261
DJU over King and Klubnik over Murphy... I'll have a double of whatever they're drinking.
I heard on TV that Cam Ward was a lightly recruited HS Sr. We'll never know but he seems like the kind of kid that PJ would have recruited here.
 

ibeattetris

Helluva Engineer
Messages
3,606
This isn't some crazy stat, but I do want to call out how much dislike the new clock changes.
Average total number of drives in GT games
2020: 24.7
2021: 22.2
2022: 22.9
2023: 22.3
2024: 16.3

We are on average having the ball 3 times less per game than the previous 4 years.
 

Root4GT

Helluva Engineer
Messages
3,312
This isn't some crazy stat, but I do want to call out how much dislike the new clock changes.
Average total number of drives in GT games
2020: 24.7
2021: 22.2
2022: 22.9
2023: 22.3
2024: 16.3

We are on average having the ball 3 times less per game than the previous 4 years.
That should work to our advantage
 

roadkill

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,921
This isn't some crazy stat, but I do want to call out how much dislike the new clock changes.
Average total number of drives in GT games
2020: 24.7
2021: 22.2
2022: 22.9
2023: 22.3
2024: 16.3

We are on average having the ball 3 times less per game than the previous 4 years.
To be fair, I'd throw out the TFG data. Too many 3-and-outs and turnovers to skew the data.
2023 vs. 2024 is interesting. I've heard Key say he wanted to shorten the game and reduce an opponent's opportunities to score as a strategy. Need more game data for 2024 to draw firm conclusions.
 

slugboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
11,724
Based on these EPA/play charts, we lost because a) we weren't able to rein in Syracuse's passing game (duh), and b) we didn't get enough plays on offense to counter them.
Kind of counterintuitive that our rushing EPA was good.

View attachment 16825View attachment 16830
That’s why Key brought up offensive inconsistency. We gave Syracuse ownership of the game. Our offensive numbers were overall good, but we gave Syracuse control of the first three quarters

Is that for the season, or just last weekend?
 
Top