I really believe that Tech hit on something with CPJ and his "system". There's a reason the service academies have upheld his philosophy. Tech and the academies can't get the same 1.8 GPA 350 pound kids the SEC schools can. It takes a certain outlook to view the "limitations" as a feature, not a bug. In an option-based system, the players can play smarter and beat a bigger, stronger, team. Regardless of all else, Tech's athletes will always be smarter. (Though certainly, guys who are bigger and smarter JHD, Gotsis, Devine, are a bonus.)
That said, I don't feel like we have to keep the flexbone. As CPJ has pointed out; after motion, Tech is essentially in a pro set for triple option plays. I'd think a pro set base could work well. Troy Calhoun at Air Force runs a great spread option style out of multiple sets, pistol, shotgun, flex. Willie Fritz's offense is similar. Bob Stitt, now at Montana, runs a spread option that is like the mirror universe pass-first version of CPJs offense. Of course, Ken Niumatalolo and Jeff Monkin both belong to the Church of CPJ.
I'd like the next coach to be like CPJ circa 2008. A history of success at a school with challenging recruiting. Like the academies or a small high academic school (see Bob Stitt, Colorado School of Mines). I want a unique system. I don't believe Tech can run the same offense as UGA, recruit the same players, and win consistently. Not because they are better, but because we are different. Gailey tried to work around Tech's "limitations" and failed. CPJ embraces the challenges that make Tech, Tech. I want our next coach to do the same. (But, hopefully, not for many years. When CPJ retires victoriously after numerous championships and a long win streak in COFH.)