- Messages
- 10,066
- Location
- Williamsburg Virginia
I did a post on the last 70 years of GT football before last season to try and figure out how CPJ did against his peers like previous coaches since Dodd did. (https://gtswarm.com/threads/70-years-of-gt-football-–-comparing-teams-under-different-coaches.2501/ ) A lot of change since then when I was trying to figure out whether CPJ deserved to stay at GT.
If you can remember there was a wee bit of discussion about keeping CPJ last year. Since going 11-3 last year with the high end of year Power Ranking (see first post 70 years background), CPJ is now at GT as long as he wants. I thought it would be interesting to see where he is all time* at GT. Or at least since Heisman showed up. You can read what people said ….
This year I wanted to look at the entire history of GT football which includes Heisman and Alexander in the comparison. I ignored the first 12 years of GT football since football was more a club sport:
The summary is that CPJ is now the best coach since Dodd and close to overtaking Alexander before him. This is based on end of year Power Ranking which I consider far better than the single metric of win percentage since SOS and Home/Away varies so much. Here’s the graph of Power Ranking for the big 3 (Heisman, Alexander and Dodd) since 1904 when Heisman took over and began the GT tradition. (Thank you Clemson for letting him go!):
And the graph I’ve used a couple times recently to show that maintaining high performance at GT is the exception rather than the rule:
And here is the average through the coaching career at GT for each coach:
Not to gloss things over, but just think about Dodd and Heisman - they averaged 16th and 19th over their careers. That will never be approached by a GT coach.
But CPJ has the opportunity to close the gap on Alexander this year or fall back behind O’Leary. I hope it’s the former, but maintaining high performance at GT is not typical since Dodd left. Regressing has been far more typical.
“Success breeds complacency. Complacency breeds failure. Only the paranoid survive.” Andrew Grove
* Here’s why I like Power Rankings the best – they reflect Strength of Schedule. https://gtswarm.com/threads/70-years-of-gt-football-–-strength-of-schedule.2489/
If you can remember there was a wee bit of discussion about keeping CPJ last year. Since going 11-3 last year with the high end of year Power Ranking (see first post 70 years background), CPJ is now at GT as long as he wants. I thought it would be interesting to see where he is all time* at GT. Or at least since Heisman showed up. You can read what people said ….
This year I wanted to look at the entire history of GT football which includes Heisman and Alexander in the comparison. I ignored the first 12 years of GT football since football was more a club sport:
The summary is that CPJ is now the best coach since Dodd and close to overtaking Alexander before him. This is based on end of year Power Ranking which I consider far better than the single metric of win percentage since SOS and Home/Away varies so much. Here’s the graph of Power Ranking for the big 3 (Heisman, Alexander and Dodd) since 1904 when Heisman took over and began the GT tradition. (Thank you Clemson for letting him go!):
And the graph I’ve used a couple times recently to show that maintaining high performance at GT is the exception rather than the rule:
And here is the average through the coaching career at GT for each coach:
Not to gloss things over, but just think about Dodd and Heisman - they averaged 16th and 19th over their careers. That will never be approached by a GT coach.
But CPJ has the opportunity to close the gap on Alexander this year or fall back behind O’Leary. I hope it’s the former, but maintaining high performance at GT is not typical since Dodd left. Regressing has been far more typical.
“Success breeds complacency. Complacency breeds failure. Only the paranoid survive.” Andrew Grove
* Here’s why I like Power Rankings the best – they reflect Strength of Schedule. https://gtswarm.com/threads/70-years-of-gt-football-–-strength-of-schedule.2489/