Search results

A decade of film says what the offense is. When we have a competent passer, we pass more. When we have competent receivers, we pass more. When we have competent protections, we pass more. Who knows what is said privately to recruits. We know Vad was told things and a major effort was made...

I was wondering about that. Makes me wonder what else was scripted. I'd rather see real competition that a scripted play. "Competition is King!" right? I said in another thread this ain't pro rasslin'. Oh well.... The one play that should have been scripted, the pass to Joe Hamilton for a...

Your name one guy and then say 50%. Nice. I highly doubt it was that high. Maybe, maybe it was 10% and that was because they weren’t seeing the field. But every single guy knew exactly what they were signing up for when they committed. A fault of Coach Johnson is that he was probably overly...

Yes, he supposed to be good to go in the fall.

Re-watch the first play from scrimmage in the spring game and tell me if we’re going to cover the tight end. David Curry bails 10 yards at the snap, TE is wide freaking open. So is the left side flat receiver for that matter.

Here is the super condensed version. The best part is the dancing at the beginning. We may not win a lot of games this year, but boy can we dance! Take a close look at the first play from scrimmage. Ignore the fact that we come out in the spread option formation. Watch the actual play. We...

Your whole theory operates on the premise that the previous team had a weak will to win or lack of buy in. I think quite the opposite. Those players knew exactly what they were signing up for, there was a very clear vision set forward by the coach. The expectations were very high, I’ve never...

No one is saying they’re exactly the same. But there are similarities that make it easier to prepare for than our old offense. If that’s not the case why did so many teams spend so much time in the off-season preparing for it? Notre Dame hired a special consultant just to prepare for it.

I hope we have somebody as good as that dude no matter what race he is.

It’s the off-season, it’s going to get worse before gets better. Actually, it was more like chum than bait. In all honesty, I found it humorous. Also, it does seem to highlight our supreme focus on branding and reliance on status symbols with recruits. Those are valid discussion points.

For what it’s worth, I think we will recruit better. With no schematic advantage anymore, we have to just to pull even with previous success. If we want to improve we have to be even better than that.

Would hate to throw some “shade” on the program. ;)

Just found it interesting that’s all. You can read into it whatever you want though.

Oh and btw, I've got a friggin' fire hose I can hook up when necessary! ;)

fify. ;)

And 1 Riddell. Business card planning meeting: Art boss: "Coach says make sure the 'cruits know we're affiliated with adidas!" Artist: "So what does that mean?" Art boss: "Better put a few logos on it." Artist: "Ok, here's my first mock up...." Art boss: "Need more logos" Artist: "But...

Clemson, Ugag: we're highly underdogs Temple, Citadel: we're highly favored (maybe not Temple) Everbody else is a push.

8 adidas logos 3 GT logos Are we recruiting for Adidas or GT?

This is the most accurate assessment of our upcoming season I've read to date. I have a little more faith in Lucas and I'm still curious as to what Tobias can do in the new O (high school offense). He ran it in high school and had big stats in the air and on the ground. He also has the "it"...

It's not absurd. Our average star rating right now is a hair above 3. CPJ was a hair below. I guess if you count early numbers, I guess you have a point, but what does that really matter? Guys predicting bumps is just speculation at this point. Imo, Collins and staff are better recruiters...