Search results

We'll leave it on agreeing on allot of things, the rest has been discussed more then enough and we all know where we each stand as far as what we believe to be the case. Here's to hoping for the best moving forward.

That's a strong statement.

Well there will certainly be two 4* DT's in this recruiting cycle (when was the last time, if ever, Tech has had that?). There's no argument against CGC's recruiting prowess. I was talking more about perception.

In a world where things don't get turned around and we let CGC go, what would the sports world call GT after several seasons below .500? If you want to call it a transition, fine, but to me, rebuilding means (in the sports world) fixing a broken team. Tech was certainly not broken.

It will be the same hardship CGC will face if he finds some success here. Given he's a defensive guy, I expect it will the the other way around, until Tech ponies up for legitimate coordinator. It's a classic case of chicken and egg though, which comes first? More funding, or success before more...

Look up Demaryius Thomas quotes when asked why he was so successful in the NFL. He always said something along the lines of working on the beating up the corner every every play the ball wasn't thrown his way, just wearing them down. There's a reason the NFL loved CPJ receivers.

Such a funny phrase that is often thrown around. Since when is a 7 win team a rebuild? If the trend from the first two seasons continues, it will actually be a rebuild next year. Hopefully not though, we are seeing flashes now, just gotta put it all together for a season. And I agree with most...

He's got a 7 year deal and the record has been nothing to negotiate higher pay over.

Vpn

Win is a win, no matter how ugly. I remember the gsu win from '14.

I think looks wise, there have been plenty of flashes of improvement. We unfortunately still have lots of relapses into bad tendencies and unfortunate injuries (I know every team deals with injuries, but it feels like we have had more then most the past decade). The flashes of good play give...

Bingo. Thankfully it seems we are more committed than in the past to changing that.

And they were playing their equals on the other side, just like we have been most weeks (minus Clemson).

That's surprising since the consensus here is that it takes 4-5 years for linemen to develope (lol).

Oh noooo

Did I hit a nerve? Again what's the excuse this season? We have a bunch of transfers from non option teams this season. I wouldn't say I'm anti CGC, I'm just against some of the antics. I do give credit to increases recruiting and I generally like the direction the defense is going. With that...

How about this year's o line, how many played in the flex bone the past two years?

BC did last year under a new head coach and they did just fine. But if people keep pushing the same propo enough, it may stick.