Search results

Seven years. Lucky us!

Lucky you. You don’t have to watch. I’m jealous.

This kind of makes my point. There are a bunch of vague references to facilitating chemistry, but that doesn’t mean anything. I’d be far more convinced if that was dated, say, May15, 2012.

I’m not saying anyone has lied. I’m saying that it’s odd that something that was never mentioned is being brought up in his defense. And candidly, he lost to the Citadel, so perhaps unless or until he actually does something that isn’t humiliating to my alma mater, I’ll be of the belief that...

Which members, and where? I’m pressing because I hadn’t seen any of this until five minutes ago, and now it’s everywhere. It sure as hell looks like this is being dangled as some sort of proof of recruiting savvy. But we can look at who he’s recruited on these here interwebs, and it ain’t all...

His status as off field personnel would not affect whether he was identified a the reason, or even a reason, for that class. This is a bedtime story people are telling themselves because we’re losing horrible games and he’s got a seven year contract.

Why?

Are we allowed to ask what he’s basing this on? This is absurd ex post facto nonsense. 12 months ago no one mentioned him. Now he’s the real reason behind the one outlier class in the history of the program? Good lord.

To be clear, we’re assigning credit for the 2007 class to Collins? That is not a leap I’d be comfortable making. Brown was three star who decommitted from Maryland, so it’s not entirely clear to me why he’d be a benchmark. Griffin was a nice get, but he’s just one. The larger issue is we...

I really want to see the evidence that he’s as good a salesman as people think. If someone can point me in that direction, I’d be grateful.

Lay the points, collect your $.

You’re question begging. You assume he has an answer. He doesn’t. He has no answers, and I’m increasingly convinced he has no clue.

He’s getting defensive, and if our performance is any indication, he’s gonna get run all over.

It’s defensible if we go 11-2 in two years (and maintain that level of success; no one will say jack if that happens). The problem is that we’d be expecting to go 11-2 with a coach who got beat at home by the Citadel. It just seems . . . unlikely.

This is the issue. Most people wouldn’t be upset about losing to Carolina or Clemson or UVA. But we had more talent - as in lots more - than the Citadel, and he lost that game. It was the perfect way to get people to think he has no effing clue what he’s doing. Tweeting is easy; coaching is...

Virginia Tech and Miami are the most obvious chances.

There’s not much evidence he can recruit.

This is exactly the issue. The reward for this garbage can’t be 8-4. It needs to be 10-2 every single season. Otherwise we should have just stayed with the option.

Battery acid

Are we sure the defense has improved? They had 50 hung on them by Clemson, which is ten points more than they put on Syracuse (it was 17-6 at halftime). They gave up 320 yards rushing and 50% on third down to a 1-AA school. The kick team still can’t cover, we muffed the first punt of the...