Search results

I am thinking Geoff has risen to this status as well...

That's terrible... clever ...but terrible

I was thinking the same thing. I was expecting tweets by now...

Too Soon... :)

That doesn't sound promising...

That's great!!! :)

yeah, that's embarrassing... :(

I do have a legitimate question re Dontae Smith. In one of the other threads I read where he is the strongest runner, but not nearly as good of a pass blocker. Could his lack of snaps be due to the fact we were forced into far more passing situations early in game?

As our last coach said: "If you look around the room and don't see the 'gimme' wins, then you are the 'gimme' win" :(

When we signed that contract GT was the far superior team...

As I think about it, the problem was not actually the 7 year contract. The problem was the buyout based on the 7 year contract. We should have given him the 7 year contract for PR purposes, but designed the buyout based on 5-6 years,

No kidding. I think there are a few people on here who would prefer to keep wining 3 games/season if it meant we never ran the option again.

Some of us a little sooner than that. :ROFLMAO:

How do you know they have specific plays designed for him?

And that is the fundamental difference. If you win you are called quirky and unusual. If you lose you are called a clown. Once again winning fixes everything

Yep, but EXTREMELY pleasantly surprised :)

maybe that is why we ran so much in the second half? The coaches knew this and wanted to get as many "real world" run-blocking reps in as they could before next week

My nephew just got in using the conditional pathway. Here is the key... Talk to admissions about it. There are some very specific classes you must take that first year and you must maintain a specific GPA ( I think it was a 3.3, but don't quote me on that). If you meet those requirements...

That is sad but really funny at the same time. And yes I do fall into that group

Then what are all those fees I pay every semester? :)