Search results

given that we gave a more seasoned and a more talented ucla team a good game. i do think we will be better than we expected. AGAIN... this season.

good review. thank you

oops

i hae the tuscon turd is more like it and while i have it on my mind... is kenny anderson in this guys corner as a read in another post or was that nonsense?

THE ONLY THING THAT WASNT CLOSE IN THAT GAME IS THE CONDITION OF YOUR FIELD. the local high schools here have BETTER FIELDS. you should be ashamed of yourself for coming here and trolling. you should hang your head in shame bud. even given the home team field advantage you still didnt lead...

over the course of the game fri night and the win saturday i forgot to bring this up until now. right before the game started they were talking or interviewing somebody. i forget. while watching you could see a glimpse of the ucla bench. i could swear that one of the ucla players had a rather...

oops

im no expert of football x's n o's but.... didnt coach groh leave him with a team based on his 3-4 d putting coach roof abit behind the 8 ball personnel wise after going back to the 4-3 d? and there has to be some advantage to having a fairly good coach who graduated from tech and bleeds...

fyi he has two fb pages. he said "money and women" are the most important things to him.

so the dwags dont have off before they play us?

how does one get house arrest in a 5 star hotel in china for 20 days? sounds like a sweet gig to me... especially if they can watch tv. eat anything on the menu and ucla/pac 10 foots the bill.

if we can beat unc we can beat ucla.

its going to be rough on this old timer. as most older folks know its harder on us to fall asleep let alone after a late night game. my head will be 'buzzing' heh. win or lose. than to make matters worse i have to ramp it up once again by noon time for the fb jackets. here's hoping we make it...

folks i apologize for the thread being pulled off topic by debbie downers such as 'jan kemp'. when i saw the headline at ramblin wreck my first thought was of pride for the staff and our athletes. some just dont see it that way.

and you SHOULD be glad youre not competing with me. i just made you look like a fool. i suspect you wouldnt want to compete with this guy either or all the OTHERS who think you should cheer for the dwags. " I'm beginning to think that you really aren't Jan Kemp." have a nice day "jan kemp".

this is one a them posts i wish i could give a huge 'dislike'. sorry but your view and saying you respect gt are 180 degrees opposite one another and the defense of your argument make NO sense. the HILL RESPECTS GT AND THE WAY IT HANDLES EDUCATION. that the staff has us where we are tells me...

really? REALLY you need somebody to tell you that stanford has a wide variety of courses for players to take that are not all that demanding?. not only that but how many quality players have we lost because we didnt have the courses they wanted to take even though they loved gt? so on both...

while i fully understand your logic. btdt myself. think of it like a club. if a group of the brightest at tech get together they will NOT have the same graduation rate as the general population. if i had a tutor and other perks to help me when i was here..... i do think it would have been...

imo i dont think we give cpj and the others involved enough credit where credit is due. http://www.ramblinwreck.com/genrel/110817aaa.html congratulations to the staffs and all the student athletes who helped make this happen!

i 'kinda' feel this way but as another poster pointed out "our perception of cjp is forever changed". i am no longer 100% towards him as i was before.