Search results

Yes. The ACC review team in Charlotte said that.

The color guy on TV called it targeting as soon as he saw it. He mentioned QB in protected area, in a vulnerable position, helmet to helmet, and also, the fact that one player went low (knee area) while the other player went to the face and neck area. A lot to sort through but what confused me...

You know, if we were not utterly convinced of the absolute pristine integrity of the immaculately honest Tobacco Road front office people in Charlotte, we might be tempted to speculate that this call was part of some evil pattern to stack the deck against Tech. 😳

😂 So some people’s method for lowering blood pressure is to intentionally try and raise other’s. NOW I understand what trolling means after all these years. 😄

I have a slight disagreement. The wide receiver screen does not work if it’s the only weapon in your quiver like Syracuse. But Miami has used it effectively this year in virtually every game and, for us, it has mainly worked at keeping the defense honest and spreading the field. I too get...

Yes, that is the question. Wes simply read the statement without comment. There was a brief silence in the booth as the two guys who get paid to announce ACC games decided to just move on. To me it was a damning silence.

Speaking of how “logical” the business world is when it comes to reading the tastes of the customers….. 🤪

This is my general reaction but since this was reviewed at the big muckety-muck ACC command and control center and they said it was helmet to helmet contact in the dangerous head and neck area but they saw no evidence of targeting, I’m willing to give them one more fking chance to explain this...

That’s a really passive aggressive thing to say. You don’t think the rest of us are capable of being logical? So you need to come on here and straighten out all of us poor benighted and misguided souls? You must be an absolute joy to work with in “the business world.”

You’re getting yourself all worked up. Quit trying to make a legal case for being upset about winning. That’s not how this is supposed to work.

I thought I understood targeting but this is the third time I’ve been fooled.

That’s your perspective, huh? Not exactly the lead story tonight, though, is it? Here’s the story. We’ve finally broken the Collins curse and are climbing out of a deep hole and are going to a bowl for the first time in five years.

Who?

Super impressed with job Sherrer did preparing for this game. With our lack of personnel I fully expected Syracuse to run us to death but Sherrer put players in a position to make plays and mostly they did. If our offense had not tried to throw the game away we could have this game by four scores.

Yep. More people available to go to games but more stuff available to do other than going to games. I still remember when the Braves came to Atlanta in 66 and crowds were large, both for the Braves and Tech. But then more and more pro teams came in, night life kicked up a bit, Six Flags was...

So how long has it been since you’ve spoken to family?

Beware the statistics monger.

To repeat what others have said, I fully expected this story to die a quick death since that is what normally happens at a factory school. Lingering and hanging around indicates we’re only seeing the tip of the iceberg. Or, as Hitchcock might say, we’ve been distracted by the MacGuffin while...

It would be the one who has never mentioned “money.”

Narrator: The shiv went in so fast and clean he was lying on the floor before he knew what hit him.