Search results

yep - e) all of the above

That isn't to Stansbury. It is to the fans. Trying to keep whatever interest he can from the general fan base. Both Stansbury and CJP know that GT just shot their financial wad hiring the new FB coaching staff and short of a "for cause" issue CJP isn't going anywhere anytime soon

What I did was have flashbacks to being the B team coach playing Team Loaded while watching the game. :inpain: Really bad nightmares :eek: :(

FWIW most every business I know has an issue with any boss subordinate type of relationship. They will move people around to make sure they don't have any liability for someone saying they didn't get ... whatever ... because of it. And worry about what happens when they break up.

I'll state the obvious. We looked like an AAU B team playing Team Loaded. They were able to do anything they wanted and we couldn't get anything even remotely easy. About the only thing I liked today was we played Moses at the 5 on D and got a chance to see that might work. We need a...

Moses overplaying the wing is obvious. He ain't ever going to get it on the wing. If we are going to play this defense I want to know if he can play the 5 on the baseline. Or look at a regular 1-3-1 and play Moses at the foul line

I fully realize CJP was option number 5 or likely more. Out of the box was pretty much a necessity by that time in the process. My point was when you hire out of the box you have to be willing to support out of the box levels. Like Vad I was high on Capel but would have been happy with...