Search results

  1. Paul Johnson time frame.

    I actually don't mind you hating the system - I'm pissed because I like it and wish he would add some wrinkles to combat all of the negative recruiting. I was simply referring to your comments about him not even bothering to recruit good players or not going after players because they're not...
  2. Paul Johnson time frame.

    I don't doubt he will. BTW, Clemson doesn't graduate significantly more than GT in football any longer (85 v 82 GSR).
  3. Paul Johnson time frame.

    Other post of mine was tldr; The reason no one takes the offense seriously is because it doesn't map to the NFL, not because it's not effective.
  4. Paul Johnson time frame.

    You and I are largely in agreement, just for different reasons. I think the offense doesn't suit GT only because I do believe that it has hurt recruiting because of the perception that it hurts NFL chances, not because of a real flaw in the system. I don't know your age, but there was once a...
  5. Paul Johnson time frame.

    Come on man. You're letting your illogical hatred of PJ and his o shine through. Of course PJ tries to recruit the same athletic olinemen that Auburn, UGA, Clemson, etc recruit. Same goes with WR. He just can't reel them in. He can't reel them in because he can't overcome the stigma of the...
  6. Paul Johnson time frame.

    Conflating two arguments. Never said that those guys aren't great in the Clemson/Bama offense because they are and have been. The point I was making is that there is no schematic advantage for Kelley Bryant making the NFL for Clemson than there would be for GT. He simply isn't (in my opinion) an...
  7. Paul Johnson time frame.

    Do you really think that if we had talented olinemen across the board that we would only cut block? As I have said before a few tweaks and the scheme becomes more palatable. The complete disregard for pursuing a legit passing offense is PJs biggest problem and it has little to do with gameday...
  8. Paul Johnson time frame.

    It doesn't and I never said it did. How does running a shotgun spread prepare Kelley Bryant for the NFL? Kelley Bryant isn't NFL QB material, but I bet he thinks he is. Same thing with a lot of really good college QBs (Jalen Hurts). Tim Tebow, etc. Most of which would be devastating in this...
  9. Paul Johnson time frame.

    Big difference between a minor and a major. Of course GT has some BS classes - every school does. What GT has is too few degree options and very few if any gimme majors. Clemson has probably double the degree options of GT. Don't intrepret my comment the wrong way, Clemson is a very good school...
  10. Paul Johnson time frame.

    That particular play was a straight 3 step drop, just like any offense. BTW, any offense that has any sprint sprint out passing (usually because of protection issues) is going to have some situations where you have to roll out the opposite of the QB throwing arm. The much bigger passing...
  11. S&P+ Updated Rankings

    With performance to date who are we clearly better than in the ACC? UNC? Maybe. Every team in the ACC will be a toss up based on what we've seen till now. You act like there is some rule that we can't be the worst team in the ACC. By the way, I don't actually think we are the worst team in the...
  12. S&P+ Updated Rankings

    Right now today, we may be the worst team in the ACC. Beat somebody first.
  13. GT vs Pitt Postgame

    I think Yates is a good passer at the high school level. I am not sure he's good enough to be a strong passer in any offense that doesn't also use his legs a lot. I don't think he's the type to drop back type and sit there and throw the ball. He would probably be the best passer that PJ has had...
  14. GT vs Pitt Postgame

    Isn't that Yates' coach? I like Yates a lot and I think he can be a good dual threat guy. However, GT is one of the only P5 offenses he would have a shot at playing QB in. It's also not real likely that he would play QB in any system that doesn't ask a QB to run a good bit. I could be wrong...
  15. GT vs Pitt Postgame

    Agree. If they're taking an engineering major or the like, calculus is part of it. Want to add more degrees, fine. Find a few and get it done. Tech will always be limited in that regard though.
  16. GT vs Pitt Postgame

    It's not really a jab on his vision, it's a jab at his lack of taking coaching. Right wrong or otherwise he was saying that he was coached to go outside and the play was designed to go outside and he chose to go in.
  17. GT vs Pitt Postgame

    Did you even read the part about lifting it for athletes?
  18. Support your team. Do not abuse the players.

    Really? Tater Bennett? CPJ's decisions weren't the only thing that cost the game. How about two dropped wide open passes. How about 4th down overthrow on a wide open route? How about another fumble by a senior? How about a late pick by a SR QB? Look PJ didn't call a great game and has been...
  19. GT vs Pitt Postgame

    Please explain to me how having to have calculus for an engineering school is elitist. GT and engineering isn't for everyone. You can't remove the calculus requirement for most of the majors because it's foundational knowledge for the work. I just said I don't care if it's lifted for athletes...
Top