Search results

One does not recruit high rollers at the $5 tables

As has been pointed out, helicopters are insufficiently swag at this point. We must not allow a swagger gap. Clearly, our only option is to redirect AE resources to making our own tiltrotor aircraft, and use it to recruit from California high schools.

You mean like offering, right?

And the money wouldn't be bad, either.

I've seen some anecdotal evidence.

Apparently french bulldogs pelvises are so deformed by breed standards that nearly all must be delivered by c section. Pretty messed up. Also appropriate for U(sic)gA

So I have to stop saying we're a drinking school with an engineering problem?!?

Not sure that rich oilmen playing farmer are the best illustration of your point.

My answer would be yes. Do you disagree? Disclaimer: We still gotta offer Wells the scholly or the whole system is a lie.

So where do ya'll think we stand with this now?

Mmm, no. I'm afraid you're gonna have to troll harder than that.

This is true. You should eat waho only so frequently

So when did you start working for Cutcliffe, and how much does he pay you to post? :rolleyes:

Gotcha. Thanks.

Hey, I too have a visceral negative reaction to the hype man. The engineer in me says the difference between a used car salesman and a hypeman is the hypeman is better at it, but both will screw you over just the same. Too many examples in the corporate world of hype being all you need and...

So they use statistical methods to determine the rate of defects and isolate the sources of variance in production? Seriously, what do those jobs do?

Unless they want to major in education or sports medicine.

There is nothing new under the sun. Until there is. That one highschool offense that had massive gaps and essentially played off of keeping who is eligible really confusing was probably new. Obviously, I favor a flying wedge formation. Things that are new and work usually get killed by rules...

I so don't understand. Can anyone help me out here?

Wait, those numbers are an argument for the validity of rankings? What would an argument against be?