Search results

5 Dallas-Ft. Worth 6 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Cal, SMU, Stanford and their TV markets. Might play a role.

In the future I can’t imagine the networks will be happy with an Alabama vs a William and Mary or Ohio State vs a Bowling Green. I know if I was spending that kind of money, I’d want the best value for the buck. Conversely that would hurt the little guy.

I don’t think we really wanted to. But maybe a few back door deals to make sure those two had a landing spot. I think once the dust settles expansion may be over for a while. The four left are about saturated.

I don’t think it’s an either/or. I’d like to get two more and get a west coast pod.

May have gotten a call from ND. Not going to join but it will help their schedule. More eyes on the ACC.

Definitely no upside. I think everyone is set for a while, except for the PAC 4. They will probably poach a smaller Western conference.

I agree. I think CFB in its entirety will stagnate. Attendance is almost maxed out by the traditional powers, Donations are probably capped. TV, with cord cutting, is maybe maxed, and the younger generation slowly going toward other sources of entertainment.

I wouldn’t mind taking those four, but don’t see any upside. Playing Stanford would be neat and maybe adding Gonzaga for the triangle Basketball fans. But other than that?

I don’t see the rosy outlook that lots of people do. This is copied from one of the most recent finds I just googled. Here's an overview of cord-cutting statistics: 95.1 million people will cut the cord in the US by 2023, which is 35.9% of the US population. There will be 80.7 million...

I’d tell FSU bye, and see you in court. Now go find a landing spot. Good luck.

Now that’s a name I haven’t heard in a long, long time.

I would think Arizona and State would be joined at the hip as far as expansion goes.

The ACC has basketball which is good programing for ESPN.

Not worried. Good path to the playoffs. Just like FSU and Clemson in a weaker ACC

Glad to see they got the microphone problem fixed. I like the statement about adapting the offense to the talent and it being Georgia Tech’s offense.

What do they bring to the SEC that they don’t already have? And I don’t think the BIG is interested at this time.