Search results

Butttt at the same time, what would we watch on those random days on November and December?* *outside of tech basketball

That was definitely one of my initial thoughts. But then I remember Clemson is a good example of what happens with a new season. I almost feel like a lottery system would be fun.

I love that idea, but how would you determine who goes to the better bowls?

I for one love watching all the bowl games. Will I admit that 60-70% are meaningless? Absolutely. But getting to watch random matchups that you rarely get to see for about 2 months straight? Sign me up

And how many of Auburn guys didn’t play that game, along with be unmotivated after not making the playoffs. So like their “National championship”, UCF doesn’t make the cut

I completely agree that the 1-loss big ten would get in with a conference championship. My point is, we need to be careful throwing out the word automatic qualifiers around a conference championship. Edit: in the current format To the G5 debate, I would say in the past they shouldn’t have been...

Oh I can completely agree with that. I have been saying that a conference championship should be a heavy factor in the equation

This absolutely baffles me. Sure, you might not be able to compare conferences, but to not be able to sit back and look and say “huh, this conference is really bad” is beyond me. One example: one side of the ACC becomes an absolute beast (will say coastal). Team A from coastal goes undefeated...

You say we can tell who the best through the season is, but then want AQ for conference champions. So do you want the best teams, or conference champions? Because that’s not always the same And random draw? We’re going to crown a champion based on complete luck of the draw? I realize some will...