Search results

I would consider "culture" to be in the category of coaching. I have 2 categories - coaching and talent ... well, there really should be a third - luck. So, you believe that our coaching is superior to the majority (or perhaps all) of the teams on our schedule then ... because it will produce...

I completely agree with you. So, are we not supposed to believe in recruiting rankings? Is there no difference between a 52 ranking and a 26 ranking (twice as good/bad numerically)? If there is no difference, why should we be excited about the possibility of higher ranked recruiting classes...

Don't you guys believe that VT, Miami, NCSt, UNC, and UVA are all a good bit more talented than us right now ... or at least somewhat more talented than us? Every one of them was around 20-30 spots ahead of us in the recruiting rankings (or another way to say it, we were about twice as bad as...

We're two years removed from winning 9, beating Ugag in Athens, and a ranked SEC team in a bowl. Last year, we were one bone-headed fumble and a bad fake-punt call away from winning 8.

247 team recruiting rankings in 2019: GT 52 ugag 2 clemson 10 vt 26 mia 28 ncst 29 unc 32 uva 34 duke 47 pitt 55 usf 76 temple 104 citadel 214 I'm trying to think of a way to produce an "objective" record prediction based on the talent as measured by recruiting rankings. This is just one...

So, if our recruiting ranking goes from 40'ish to 20'ish, does that still keep us in that "bunch" with most of our competitors and still far behind our 2 biggest rivals?

So we have superior coaching (if part of coaching is player development) to most every team on the schedule.