Search results

Mizzou is about as charmed as any team I’ve seen.

Sorry to hear about hospice… I glossed over that part when reading the first time. Incredible guy! Makes me feel especially lazy this morning!:LOL: I’m fascinated by boat building. How awesome… where did he find all of these hours in his day?

The Mizzou (paper) Tigers ranking is pretty suspect…

Agree. Somewhat disagree Agree. On the somewhat disagree - Duke had success downfield against man cover. Duke OL picked up blitz and Murphy did a good job of getting rid of the ball to one on one receivers who made plays. Duke couldn’t run the ball to save their life. They made chunk plays...

No doubt. It’s a risk associated with the ongoing success of our program. It’s a good sign if other programs want to do what we’re doing. I hope we can fight and retain the good ones but even more so, I hope we can be one of those programs that can continually find / develop / promote great...

Yeah… I caught some of that scuttlebutt a couple days ago. Tried to ignore it, but just to be safe, can someone please steal his cell phone, cut his office line and hack his email account?

Fortunes change quickly in a college football season. I’m very pleased with what I’m seeing out of our guys. However, I suspect uGA will look different tomorrow night. They’re apparently pretty banged up along the OL also… I’d expect they heal up against UMass before we get them.

I presume he means 1-3 can’t be employed as a tie breaker because there is not a common opponent to all tied teams. As far as percentage, I’d have to take his word for it. I’m sure four or five of them will land in the CFP regardless (for all of my griping about the BIG, if they do leave out...

Fresh off of a rigorous film session consisting of a couple of NCST condensed games, my novice to intermediate football mind would submit their Wake game as exhibit A. Wake runs a lot of similar concepts to us offensively and Claiborne is a J Haynes doppelgänger. Lots of East / West and outside...

Correct… a VOLS win makes it simple. The original premise was a uGA win to create a logjam of 2-loss teams behind the winner of Tx v aTm. The question then morphed to whether or not LSU has a shot at the SECCG to steal a bid. No one has been willing to crunch those numbers (yet)… I’m still...

It’s an issue. BIG is going to take 1/3 of CFP spots and “Strength of schedule” is going to be used to exclude a SMU, BYU, Miami, Army, Boise or even Washington State. To be clear, I don’t think Wazzoo needs to be there, but Wazzoo’s best win (Washington) looks a whole lot like the best win for...

The “they” I was referring to was LSU. It was in response to your post saying LSU has a chance. If had typed a clear and complete thought, that post would’ve looked like: I haven’t scrutinized the tiebreaker rules but having lost to aTm and Bama, it seems they LSU need a lot more help than...

What? Where are the insiders I was promised?

I haven’t scrutinized the tiebreaker rules but having lost to aTm and Bama, it seems they need a lot more help than that. When we get into a 5 team logjam, who knows? Maybe if Ole Miss finished with 2 losses they get some edge?

Agree… But it will, and that’s why I think the days of conf champ games are numbered. Consider BYU… They are undefeated and have TWO wins over teams currently ranked 16 and 14. Yet they are behind IU and PSU, who have ZERO wins COMBINED over top 25 teams. If BYU loses the B12 CG to Colorado...

Yup… In the most theoretical of theoreticals, only a top 7 ranking is a CFP lock. If upsets happened just right, all five conference champions could be outside of the top seven ranking. Befor someone exclaims that it could never happen, I would counter that for the BIG and the SEC, there will...

Good work! It’s obvious Bama and uGA drew the toughest schedules. If TN has wins over both, it’s tough to say they don’t deserve the nod. Tx needs to be REALLY impressive against aTm in my opinion, but they are so high up that they could lose, not go to the SECCG and still be a lock for CFP...