Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Willie Fritz and the spread option
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SteamWhistle" data-source="post: 643458" data-attributes="member: 1951"><p>Where you lost me, no team that loses to Duke and UNC at home will Sniff the CFBP as long as it’s 4 teams. </p><p>Also that OL you mentioned was the pretty much the exact same from last season, I don’t see improvement there especially against the big boys and with Sewaks coaching. You also mentioned Graham in the QB discussion, you think he beats out Tobias, and if not you think he stays and plays WR after being suspended? Nate Woody got his first big boy job and stunk it up in year 1 and you’re very eager to give him time, where’s this energy for Coach Collins?! It’s getting to the point where it almost seems very clear your opinions are biased, if you really thought this year was about to be a triple option super team then what were the coaches doing last year with almost the exact same team but with in my opinion better ABs and WRs? Same exact OL as last year, but no Brad, Qua, Clinton, but this year would’ve been better? I have to disagree especially after seeing how the Defense faired last year, and how little the personnel has changed this season. I just can’t see what would’ve made this years team better then last year under the same staff, the talent is pretty much the same if not worse. The only thing I see improving is QB play, but how much does that help us? According to you the offense wasn’t the problem, looking at the personnel Tech still would’ve been out Manned up front on both sides of the ball which is the same thing going on right now. I’m sure we would’ve put up more points on Citadel and Temple, but do I chalk Temple up as a win based on Woody’s performance last year, just can’t do it. I hope You see a pattern here, how frustrating it can be when someone judges a coaches future off of one season. I do think Paul wins 5-6 games this season, but what’s that really good for at the end of the day, a coach in year 12 squeaking out 6 wins isn’t success imo. Also a side note, I encourage you to watch the film of our current commits and look at their offers, hopefully since you were a former athlete yourself you will see the night and day difference in talent and explosiveness. Back to my original point Tech was going to be in a bad spot regardless of who was coaching this year, I truly believe that. Even with an improved Defense, would a CPJ coached squad this year even sniff the success of 2009 or 2014? I think it’s fair and logical to say no, and I understand based on Techs history that’s not to be expected every year, but it was your main point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SteamWhistle, post: 643458, member: 1951"] Where you lost me, no team that loses to Duke and UNC at home will Sniff the CFBP as long as it’s 4 teams. Also that OL you mentioned was the pretty much the exact same from last season, I don’t see improvement there especially against the big boys and with Sewaks coaching. You also mentioned Graham in the QB discussion, you think he beats out Tobias, and if not you think he stays and plays WR after being suspended? Nate Woody got his first big boy job and stunk it up in year 1 and you’re very eager to give him time, where’s this energy for Coach Collins?! It’s getting to the point where it almost seems very clear your opinions are biased, if you really thought this year was about to be a triple option super team then what were the coaches doing last year with almost the exact same team but with in my opinion better ABs and WRs? Same exact OL as last year, but no Brad, Qua, Clinton, but this year would’ve been better? I have to disagree especially after seeing how the Defense faired last year, and how little the personnel has changed this season. I just can’t see what would’ve made this years team better then last year under the same staff, the talent is pretty much the same if not worse. The only thing I see improving is QB play, but how much does that help us? According to you the offense wasn’t the problem, looking at the personnel Tech still would’ve been out Manned up front on both sides of the ball which is the same thing going on right now. I’m sure we would’ve put up more points on Citadel and Temple, but do I chalk Temple up as a win based on Woody’s performance last year, just can’t do it. I hope You see a pattern here, how frustrating it can be when someone judges a coaches future off of one season. I do think Paul wins 5-6 games this season, but what’s that really good for at the end of the day, a coach in year 12 squeaking out 6 wins isn’t success imo. Also a side note, I encourage you to watch the film of our current commits and look at their offers, hopefully since you were a former athlete yourself you will see the night and day difference in talent and explosiveness. Back to my original point Tech was going to be in a bad spot regardless of who was coaching this year, I truly believe that. Even with an improved Defense, would a CPJ coached squad this year even sniff the success of 2009 or 2014? I think it’s fair and logical to say no, and I understand based on Techs history that’s not to be expected every year, but it was your main point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Willie Fritz and the spread option
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top