Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Why do we stay with Russell Athletic?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTFLETCH" data-source="post: 256271" data-attributes="member: 1668"><p>I hope you are correct. I just do not see UA throwing 65M to GT (Some poster stated we could get utah money), when they would be losing money as GT gear only has sales of 10M. (must divide that 10M between all the folks who sell GT gear, not just UA, But Nike, Knights, Champion, RA) SO anyone thinking UA will pay 65M to GT and only sell 8M in gear would be basically calling the UA Leadership STUPID! I am not buying any of that!</p><p></p><p>Utah does not have a pro team, and the only other Salt Lake City team is the NBA JAzz, so Utah is the "team" in Salt Lake City.</p><p></p><p>While I do think UA would sign GT I just think they want to pay 1.5M a year. Which would be a 1M dollar loss per year on the GTAA who does not have the same donor support at Auburn, UGA, Clemson, FSU, UF. So we need UA or Nike to pay us 65M per year.</p><p></p><p>But all I have heard is nike and UA is interested in siging at 1M to 2M range,(that would be last in the ACC and would would lose $$ from RA deal) So if the NEW AD can get UA or Nike, Adidas to pay 2.5M -3M I would be happy, but we will still have the worst deal in the ACC. A Shame as RA was willing to pay 5M per year. I want the most money for the GTAA so we can try and keep pace with other ACC teams!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTFLETCH, post: 256271, member: 1668"] I hope you are correct. I just do not see UA throwing 65M to GT (Some poster stated we could get utah money), when they would be losing money as GT gear only has sales of 10M. (must divide that 10M between all the folks who sell GT gear, not just UA, But Nike, Knights, Champion, RA) SO anyone thinking UA will pay 65M to GT and only sell 8M in gear would be basically calling the UA Leadership STUPID! I am not buying any of that! Utah does not have a pro team, and the only other Salt Lake City team is the NBA JAzz, so Utah is the "team" in Salt Lake City. While I do think UA would sign GT I just think they want to pay 1.5M a year. Which would be a 1M dollar loss per year on the GTAA who does not have the same donor support at Auburn, UGA, Clemson, FSU, UF. So we need UA or Nike to pay us 65M per year. But all I have heard is nike and UA is interested in siging at 1M to 2M range,(that would be last in the ACC and would would lose $$ from RA deal) So if the NEW AD can get UA or Nike, Adidas to pay 2.5M -3M I would be happy, but we will still have the worst deal in the ACC. A Shame as RA was willing to pay 5M per year. I want the most money for the GTAA so we can try and keep pace with other ACC teams! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Why do we stay with Russell Athletic?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top