Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Which of these 3 has mess up college football
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cpf2001" data-source="post: 971546" data-attributes="member: 6459"><p>You're right, you didn't say the market inside college football didn't exist for players who wouldn't make the NFL, I misread that. So no need to stress that there is market value to players outside the top 10% of programs. But here's what I take issue with, directly in your words, from your reply to someone who liked the idea of funneling more of the revenue to the players, with the particularly egregious part in bold:</p><p></p><p></p><p>The name of the school is not the "only" reason for value for players any more than it is for coaches, administrators, or anyone else involved. If all the coaches started their own league in the same cities as their colleges? Failure. If all the ADs did it? Failure. So if there's value to a coach, there's value to a player. And this is what we see in front of us. Yet you dispute that the players have value by constructing some weird argument against a scenario <em>nobody has proposed</em> about trying to replace the system wholesale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cpf2001, post: 971546, member: 6459"] You're right, you didn't say the market inside college football didn't exist for players who wouldn't make the NFL, I misread that. So no need to stress that there is market value to players outside the top 10% of programs. But here's what I take issue with, directly in your words, from your reply to someone who liked the idea of funneling more of the revenue to the players, with the particularly egregious part in bold: The name of the school is not the "only" reason for value for players any more than it is for coaches, administrators, or anyone else involved. If all the coaches started their own league in the same cities as their colleges? Failure. If all the ADs did it? Failure. So if there's value to a coach, there's value to a player. And this is what we see in front of us. Yet you dispute that the players have value by constructing some weird argument against a scenario [I]nobody has proposed[/I] about trying to replace the system wholesale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Which of these 3 has mess up college football
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top